Kopek Posted February 2, 2022 Share Posted February 2, 2022 Claire wants it as social housing, 'Lovely, twee end of terrace cottage ''.??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Non-Believer Posted February 2, 2022 Share Posted February 2, 2022 On 1/31/2022 at 3:07 PM, hissingsid said: Why are they trying to save Newsons it is an old building…yes but if they knocked it down the Saddle would come into its own and it is an old building which provides fun and frivolity to many 😊 Anybody with any sense would drop both buildings 😂 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hissingsid Posted February 2, 2022 Share Posted February 2, 2022 You are obviously not a karaoke fan 🤩 ……. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hissingsid Posted February 2, 2022 Share Posted February 2, 2022 Why ? Do the Tax Payers Alliance meet in the Saddle 😜 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banker Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 Fresh plans which looks pretty good IMHO & should be approved https://gef.im/2022/02/18/fresh-bid-made-to-develop-north-quay/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amadeus Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 On 2/2/2022 at 8:01 PM, offshoremanxman said: That would leave the Manx Taxpayers Alliance homeless. Which actually might not be a bad decision. There's an old phone booth nearby they can move into. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x-in-man Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 58 minutes ago, Banker said: Fresh plans which looks pretty good IMHO & should be approved https://gef.im/2022/02/18/fresh-bid-made-to-develop-north-quay/ Oooh another coffee shop and punch-up bar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happier diner Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 1 hour ago, x-in-man said: Oooh another coffee shop and punch-up bar. Better than a falling over derelict eyesore. 2 hours ago, Banker said: Fresh plans which looks pretty good IMHO & should be approved https://gef.im/2022/02/18/fresh-bid-made-to-develop-north-quay/ Lets bloody well hope so. Although - Some crazy "Save Newsoms" group will undoubtedly form. Maybe the same lot that campaigned against the 5G mast at Woodbourne Rd. Our gutless planners will defer to the noisy minority and reject it, leaving another derelict eyesore (and a terrible phone signal) in our otherwise magnificent capital. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
finlo Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 10 minutes ago, Happier diner said: Better than a falling over derelict eyesore. Lets bloody well hope so. Although - Some crazy "Save Newsoms" group will undoubtedly form. Maybe the same lot that campaigned against the 5G mast at Woodbourne Rd. Our gutless planners will defer to the noisy minority and reject it, leaving another derelict eyesore (and a terrible phone signal) in our otherwise magnificent capital. Otherwise magnificent? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happier diner Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 1 minute ago, finlo said: Otherwise magnificent? Worth a try😍 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Thomas Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 4 hours ago, Happier diner said: Maybe the same lot that campaigned against the 5G mast at Woodbourne Rd. Our gutless planners will defer to the noisy minority and reject it, leaving another derelict eyesore (and a terrible phone signal) in our otherwise magnificent capital. 5G mast? The mast was not 5G. Planners did not reject. Appeal was successful based on legal arguments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happier diner Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 2 minutes ago, Chris Thomas said: 5G mast? The mast was not 5G. Planners did not reject. Appeal was successful based on legal arguments. Legal arguements? I apologise if I was wrong about 5G. So it was nothing to do with the noisy majority then. That's interesting. Why then, in terms that actually mean something, was it rejected? Please don't say legal arguements. That is meaningless to me. Where is a mast that gives your constituents a phone signal going to be placed that does not fall foul of legal arguments? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
finlo Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 (edited) 22 minutes ago, Chris Thomas said: 5G mast? The mast was not 5G. Planners did not reject. Appeal was successful based on legal arguments. It says 5g in the news reports are they wrong then? Edited February 18, 2022 by finlo 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kopek Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 (edited) Legal arguments. It could be seen from Selbourne Drive!!! Edited February 18, 2022 by Kopek 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happier diner Posted February 19, 2022 Share Posted February 19, 2022 8 hours ago, Kopek said: Legal arguments. It could be seen from Selbourne Drive!!! That's the idea of masts isn't it. Until someone events an invisible one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.