Jump to content

Gas deposit


hissingsid

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, John Wright said:

 

4. I’d assume the gas would be treated before being pumped to UK or IRL. The gas we get is treated. I don’t think they’d want to mix treated and untreated in the same pipe. Any VAT would fall into the Revenue Sharing Agreement, wherever it’s collected/paid. However the gas extraction output might  increase the Manx National Income and so increase the percentage of VAT we get. But the division is based on where consumption falls. So, not by much.

FERSA explained, here

https://www.gov.im/media/1370014/an-explanation-of-fersa.pdf

The gas would be treated/cleaned of impurities here in a small cleaning plant close to where it lands, most probably somewhere on the north east coast, being the closest land point to the gas field. Much cheaper to create pipelines on/under land than at sea. 

The cleaned gas would then be fed into the existing interconnector at Glen Mooar for export.

We are adding value to that extracted gas here by cleaning it and therefore VAT will be charged on sales of that gas, which our customs and excise will receive.

My understanding is that IOMG  effectively would keep all of that VAT and not have to share under FERSA, as hydrocarbons are excluded in the FERSA agreement as the VAT on them can be directly measured through quantities.

Indeed, as JW states, we don't benefit from sharing the VAT on UK hyrdocarbon extraction, so why should UK benefit from ours?

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Phillip Dearden said:

Are you sure?

No, I'm not a VAT expert. But assuming the VAT the Govt will claim and we pay on the gas will be thrown into the common purse and worked out accordingly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Phillip Dearden said:

Are you sure?

 

3 minutes ago, b4mbi said:

My understanding is that IOMG  effectively would keep all of that VAT and not have to share under FERSA, as hydrocarbons are excluded in the FERSA agreement as the VAT on them can be directly measured through quantities.

Indeed, as JW states, we don't benefit from sharing the VAT on UK hyrdocarbon extraction, so why should UK benefit from ours?

 

Oh there we go. Gas would be exempt from the agreement.

See, complicated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, The Phantom said:

 

Oh there we go. Gas would be exempt from the agreement.

See, complicated.

I think! I am no VAT expert.... 😄

However @Phillip Deardenformer accounting firm tax director maybe in a better position to advise....

Edited by b4mbi
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, The Phantom said:

 

Oh there we go. Gas would be exempt from the agreement.

See, complicated.

There’s no VAT arising in the IoM bringing it on shore or cleaning and processing, unless the extractor sells it to the processor. The VAT arises on sale to the gas company in either UK or IRL, and I’m not sure whether that’s when you put it into the pipe or when it comes out at the other end.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, b4mbi said:

The gas would be treated/cleaned of impurities here in a small cleaning plant close to where it lands, most probably somewhere on the north east coast, being the closest land point to the gas field. Much cheaper to create pipelines on/under land than at sea. 

The cleaned gas would then be fed into the existing interconnector at Glen Mooar for export.

We are adding value to that extracted gas here by cleaning it and therefore VAT will be charged on sales of that gas, which our customs and excise will receive.

My understanding is that IOMG  effectively would keep all of that VAT and not have to share under FERSA, as hydrocarbons are excluded in the FERSA agreement as the VAT on them can be directly measured through quantities.

Indeed, as JW states, we don't benefit from sharing the VAT on UK hyrdocarbon extraction, so why should UK benefit from ours?

 

I think you are confusing Hydrocarbon Duty ( which isn’t shared ) and VAT on sale of hydrocarbons ( which is ).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, John Wright said:

I think you are confusing Hydrocarbon Duty ( which isn’t shared ) and VAT on sale of hydrocarbons ( which is ).

Ah yes, I think I may have. Apologies.

So without seeing the FERSA agreement itself (what was linked was a guide) we can't judge the effect collection on the IOM of VAT from hydrocarbon sales (to Ireland? To UK?) will have on the calculations of how much VAT the island actually receives.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 6/6/2022 at 8:46 PM, b4mbi said:

Ah yes, I think I may have. Apologies.

So without seeing the FERSA agreement itself (what was linked was a guide) we can't judge the effect collection on the IOM of VAT from hydrocarbon sales (to Ireland? To UK?) will have on the calculations of how much VAT the island actually receives.

 

I missed this 6 weeks ago. Any VAT charged  would go into the notional joint pot to be divvied out according to national income under FERSA. So it’s neutral if subject to VAT in IoM when it goes into the pipeline and if it’s VAT charged when it comes out of the pipe in Ireland then it won’t go into the pot.

Thats because there is no VAT on exports of goods from UK/IoM. The recipient accounts for VAT in the country of import as a self charge. So it doesn’t get into the pot. It goes to the Irish tax man.

I think the no VAT situation applies, and therefore it has no effect on VAT, if the sale is to Ireland.

Its not a FERSA matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, John Wright said:

No. It doesn’t affect the one existing licence issued.

No, but according to the MR report there will be no further licences issued.  This one won't be revoked, but if there is no extraction licence, what's the point in exploring? 

I do hope I heard wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m pleased the politicians have done this. Hopefully the shit show that is Crogga comes to nothing as well. If there was anything there don’t you think a big player would’ve been in first or taken an option from Crogga by now? As it is they’re drumming up small stakes investment and leaning on Government for extension after extension.

  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just hope they will be able to fully explore  the proposed gas field , and at no cost to the taxpayer , and if there is a substantial amount of gas there ,be permitted  to extract it , if the Russians pull the rug on the germans this autumn  any gas deposits will become extremely valuable ,and it would be extremely  foolish for the isle of man government  to deprive the market place  of an opportunity  to have access to this ,which could prove to be very beneficial  in making the transitional change away from fossil fuels ,which will not happen overnight and could take years , 

just hope IOM PLC has not bottled out ! or filled its trousers 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...