ian rush Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 (edited) On 11/26/2021 at 7:20 PM, Stu Peters said: My employers are the people of Middle. Who stand to benefit significantly from the deal. It's them I represent, not Greta Thunberg and her supporters. I thought you were listening to Diccen and his magic fucking beans on this one. Next phase £50m+. Edited December 5, 2021 by ian rush Typo. 3 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Peters Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 I hve been listening to Diccen. I thought he made a great case on the Mannin Line. And yes, his estimates could be well off, but if we only made £500 million rather than five thousand million as predicted, I still think they should be allowed to crack on. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b4mbi Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 33 minutes ago, ian rush said: I thought you were listening to Diccen and his magic fucking beans on this one. Next phase £50m+. What's your beef? Doesn't matter what it costs if it's private investment, taxpayer funds are not being asked for. First step find out actually what's there. Moronic not to. Then make a call. 7 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lightening McQueen Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 On 11/26/2021 at 9:38 PM, Banker said: We can’t afford not to at least establish if this gas exists, Sturgeon is trying to get rid of the only good thing Scotland have ie Oil!’ What about Irn Bru and battered Mars Bars, it has them too? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian rush Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 The beef is theyre not going to raise the money and the shit people latch on to. Magic beans. You know how much a seismic survey costs? BP had a sniff years ago and jibbed it. Im not so naive as to exclude fossil fuel on the way to clean tech but this is just like e-habitant, liverpool landing stage and 2.5g. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b4mbi Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 Yes, and they should be given a chance to raise it. Even if they don't then the investors lose their shirts and exactly what harm is done? E-habitant and Liverpool landing stage both government... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted December 6, 2021 Share Posted December 6, 2021 7 hours ago, Stu Peters said: I hve been listening to Diccen. I thought he made a great case on the Mannin Line. And yes, his estimates could be well off, but if we only made £500 million rather than five thousand million as predicted, I still think they should be allowed to crack on. I thought he came across as a right smarmy twat. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cissolt Posted December 6, 2021 Share Posted December 6, 2021 18 hours ago, b4mbi said: Yes, and they should be given a chance to raise it. Even if they don't then the investors lose their shirts and exactly what harm is done? E-habitant and Liverpool landing stage both government... e-habitant was probably ahead of its time! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Power Posted December 8, 2021 Share Posted December 8, 2021 Just get it out, we need energy security until the other pipe dreams are viable. The Green Party response? As expected, with the usual wooly headed, pie in the sky rhetoric! https://www.manxradio.com/news/isle-of-man-news/extracting-gas-from-manx-waters-the-better-option-minister/ 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GD4ELI Posted December 8, 2021 Share Posted December 8, 2021 1 hour ago, Max Power said: Just get it out, we need energy security until the other pipe dreams are viable. The Green Party response? As expected, with the usual wooly headed, pie in the sky rhetoric! https://www.manxradio.com/news/isle-of-man-news/extracting-gas-from-manx-waters-the-better-option-minister/ You and the other intellectuals do realise that a large, sophisticated processing plant is required before the great unwashed can use it? #think? 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Peters Posted December 8, 2021 Share Posted December 8, 2021 Not unduly large, not necessarily ugly, assuredly eco friendly. And not a direct cost to the taxpayer. And we can sell excess capacity to you in Grocklehampton. What's not to like? 2 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GD4ELI Posted December 8, 2021 Share Posted December 8, 2021 2 minutes ago, Stu Peters said: Not unduly large, not necessarily ugly, assuredly eco friendly. And not a direct cost to the taxpayer. And we can sell excess capacity to you in Grocklehampton. What's not to like? How is gas processing eco-friendly. And who on the rock has the competence for such a project? Did you even factor in the number of people who use gas? And timescales? And the impact on our doomed planet? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slinkydevil Posted December 8, 2021 Share Posted December 8, 2021 45 minutes ago, GD4ELI said: And the impact on our doomed planet? It's only doomed for my kids and their kids. I've told them I'll be long gone and they need to stop crying and man up and deal with the natural disasters, famine, wars and death like everone else. Merry Christmas. 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happier diner Posted December 8, 2021 Share Posted December 8, 2021 48 minutes ago, GD4ELI said: How is gas processing eco-friendly. And who on the rock has the competence for such a project? Did you even factor in the number of people who use gas? And timescales? And the impact on our doomed planet? Why does anyone on this rock need to have this competence? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cissolt Posted December 8, 2021 Share Posted December 8, 2021 Looking forward to hearing Professor Ashford telling us about how fracking is actually beneficial for the climate 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.