Jump to content

Moorehouse wants a new Sea Terminal


hissingsid

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, thommo2010 said:

Our sea terminal is fine. It has what 3 arrivals a day, people are in and out those waiting to board have a coffee shop and somewhere to gey papers if they so wish. We are not an international hub so we don't need an all singing all dancing ferry port 

Agreed but I guess at some stage the asbestos issue will have to be dealt with.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Happier diner said:

It's clearly not the worst by a long way. I'm not sure why you have that impression. 

True. For a minimal amount of taxpayers cash it can be tidied up. Painting, plastering the ceiling of the baggage reclaim area. Fortunes need not be spent but it needs tidying up. Tidy up the outsides to make it pleasant and inviting. Some of the other parts it looks like a tatty MNH exhibit in a time warp to the late Victorian early Edwardian period

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, 2112 said:

True. For a minimal amount of taxpayers cash it can be tidied up. Painting, plastering the ceiling of the baggage reclaim area. Fortunes need not be spent but it needs tidying up. Tidy up the outsides to make it pleasant and inviting. Some of the other parts it looks like a tatty MNH exhibit in a time warp to the late Victorian early Edwardian period

Just think "vaccine hubs" to fully appreciate the irony of that statement...

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Sea Terminal is one of the finest designed buildings on the island. This should be registered.

It need modernisation but with great care. Start with removing the outside additions like the hideous windows/ rooms that have been built under the "crown" to give it back its style.

Criminal if this was dropped.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Boris Johnson said:

The Sea Terminal is one of the finest designed buildings on the island. This should be registered.

It need modernisation but with great care. Start with removing the outside additions like the hideous windows/ rooms that have been built under the "crown" to give it back its style.

Criminal if this was dropped.

It's certainly of it's time and you'd hope that any revamping would be sensitively done. I know a lot of people don't particularly like it but it would be a shame if it was, as you say, dropped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Boris Johnson said:

The Sea Terminal is one of the finest designed buildings on the island. This should be registered.

It need modernisation but with great care. Start with removing the outside additions like the hideous windows/ rooms that have been built under the "crown" to give it back its style.

Criminal if this was dropped.

I couldn't agree more. As you say, if anything it should be reinstated back to its former self.

I was walking past the old nurse's home on Westmorland Road today. That's a nice building of unusual architecture on the island. It's a shame to see it not being used. 

It would make ideal offices for some government departments with a bit of a refurb. Does the government own it? Do they have any plans for it? Or is it just to be left to rot and be sold to a developer to knock down and build more soulless "luxury" flats?  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Derek Flint said:

 

Going which way?

Work out the per head cost over even the next 30 years and it will be even more than the subsidy costs for the Horse trams.

 

Inbound to the island. Mostly residents who've gone across for shopping/football/drinking. None of which you can do in Heysham.

The Steam Packet needs a presence in Liverpool. Regardless of whether the Half-Tide Dock is the right location (doubtful) and whether it needs an all-singing terminal (doubtful), pulling out of the city isn't really an option.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/27/2021 at 12:43 PM, Manx17 said:

That isn’t per sailing to Liverpool though  and the Heysham sailing is mostly for the use of freight . 

It is. The Saturday and Sunday night crossings usually had 300+ on them, hence the problems at the Sea Terminal processing them. The last one of the season had 500 on it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Manx17 said:

Not  from the Isle of Man they didn’t as I got all numbers for every sailing every day. The most passengers on the mannann are on the grand national day  and people leaving after TT fortnight . After that I would say 150/ 200 on a Saturday. So maybe your writing about leaving Liverpool and people are returning after taking a break away.

Over the last decade ( excluding Covid ) SPCo has carried approx 600,000 a year. Strip out the Irish routes and Heysham and Liverpool averaged 270,000 approx each. There are more sailings between IoM and Heysham, up to 28 a week and 52 weeks a year.

So, yes, on average, per sailing, more come off the SeaCat. However more travel on Ben my Chree on day time sailings than overnight. So the numbers of arrivals through putting the Sea Terminal from day time sailings ( arrivals at 13.00, 18.00 and 22.00 aren’t on average much different between the Conventional and fast craft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ringy Rose said:

Inbound to the island. Mostly residents who've gone across for shopping/football/drinking. None of which you can do in Heysham.

The Steam Packet needs a presence in Liverpool. Regardless of whether the Half-Tide Dock is the right location (doubtful) and whether it needs an all-singing terminal (doubtful), pulling out of the city isn't really an option.

It’s not worth £60m. If folk wanted to go to Liverpool take the plane.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Manx17 said:

So maybe your writing about leaving Liverpool and people are returning after taking a break away.

Yep, inbound from Liverpool, and those are the numbers I've been told are processed by the borders lot. Maybe it's slightly less in a "normal" year.

 

2 minutes ago, Derek Flint said:

It’s not worth £60m. If folk wanted to go to Liverpool take the plane.

The cost of the option they chose doesn't mean a Liverpool port isn't required.

49 minutes ago, Manx17 said:

It would be good to find out if more people would prefer the Heysham sailing , as a lot of vehicle owners sailing on the Ben prefer it.

If you're driving then the big issue with Liverpool is you get chucked out right in the city centre right in the middle of rush hour. Now you don't have to go through Lancaster to get to the M6, Heysham has an advantage there. The down side is four hours on the Ben.

For foot passengers, the problem at Heysham is there's little public transport, other than the one train off the morning boat that takes an age to get to Lancaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...