Jump to content

.


ManxTaxPayer

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Mercenary said:

Is the justification safety? If so should be any 2 wheelers surely, powered or unpowered 😁?

Well by that logic banning any vehicles at all would also be safer. And we should ban planes flying over it too, then there would be no accidents up there.

Oh no, hang on, that would amount to it being closed and MTP doesn't like the roads being closed. Not the outcome he would have wanted when he wanted to ban cyclist up there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, A fool and his money..... said:

I don't need to look it up. If you're going straight on at a round about you wouldn't signal on the approach, unless you were changing lanes.

You wouldn’t signal coming up from anachoar to go to the airport?  I have a feeling you would fail your test

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, A fool and his money..... said:

Oh no, hang on, that would amount to it being closed and MTP doesn't like the roads being closed. Not the outcome he would have wanted when he wanted to ban cyclist up there.

I wouldn't want to ban cyclist(s) up anywhere. I've never been a banner. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ManxTaxPayer said:

 

Why not? It will result in a logical and sensible harmonisation. 

But we're not harmonised with any other country in the world, why should we be with the UK?

If these changes are necessary, why have we waited for the UK to enact them before we do?

I would have thought the logical and sensible approach would be to use our autonomy in this area to reflect the needs and requirements of our road users, rather than just blindly following the UK,who, in highway terms is not particularly similar to our selves or much of the rest of the world.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ManxTaxPayer said:

Well we are really, with the mainland. I've done an awful lot of driving in both jurisdictions and they are, to all extent and purpose, identical. 

Very similar, but through convenience rather than necessity. And given our abundance of politicians and senior civil servants, the latter would be a more logical and sensible motivation for change than the former.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, offshoremanxman said:

I saw this it’s typical DOI logic. Rather than admit their mini roundabouts are generally stupid and people drive over then because they’re installed stupidly they now pass laws to enforce compliance with their own stupidity rather than change the way they install their stupid roundabouts to make them functional. They simply never learn. They are the most incompetent people you will find in any government anywhere.

As Nick Black said, "We need new standards" 😂

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...