Unesco Biosphere Status

[The Voice of Reason]

9 hours ago, The Phantom said:

It was actually Unesco Heritage status they lost. Because years of development (investment and jobs) has ruined the Victorian Dock apocalyptic wasteland. 

But otherwise your point is still valid. 

Ah yes. Thanks for the correction 

[b4mbi]

13 hours ago, Moghrey Mie said:

Let's see who turns up for this job.

https://www.gov.im/news/2024/aug/01/inspirational-leader-sought-for-pivotal-biosphere-chapter/

https://www.biosphere.im/uploads/ubiom-board-chair-role-description-v1-2_001.pdf

 

 

£7500 for 24days a year work to achieve what? To chair important meetings to exchange a lot of hot air.

Should submit an FOI request to see how much we pay UNESCO for our "unique" biosphere status. 

[The Phantom]

1 hour ago, b4mbi said:

£7500 for 24days a year work to achieve what? To chair important meetings to exchange a lot of hot air.

I thought the objective was to reduce hot air. 

1 hour ago, b4mbi said:

Should submit an FOI request to see how much we pay UNESCO for our "unique" biosphere status. 

Now that would be interesting.

[Two-lane]

2 hours ago, b4mbi said:

Should submit an FOI request to see how much we pay UNESCO for our "unique" biosphere status. 

The total cost is what matters. I assume an FoI is not worth the effort, because no-one is counting.

[A fool and his money.....]

11 hours ago, Twitch said:

If the Manx Government ran Liverpool the Three Graces would have been demolished for car parking.

Although the Facebook Karens would go on to say;

"Actually it's not a car park, it's awaiting development. I wouldn't park there because if your car gets bashed you'll have no comeback (a bit like every other car park on the planet)"