Jump to content

Firm closing


finlo

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Omobono said:

they do  have a significant amount of back office staff , and I think a lot of customers would be inconvenienced if the banking facilities were in Strand St , its impossible to park near  there  these days ,

It's not that convenient to park where it is. 

Presumably the new place will be just another empty shell like building like the IOM bank. Machines to do basic business and just a couple of staff to signpost and advise.

Redundancies then presumably.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gladys said:

How can they offer it with a long lease?  Have they settled with the landlord?  Or is there something other little twist that is not apparent? 

Frankly it makes little sense.  If it is so profitable, how come the previous tenants came to grief.

Could it be the landlord that is selling it after seizing the assets (equipment) in settlement?

The coffee shop share wouldn't really make sense if that were the case though, unless something very twisty going on. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Gladys said:

How can they offer it with a long lease?  Have they settled with the landlord?  Or is there something other little twist that is not apparent? 

Well it was previously said that there were only two years on the current lease, so presumably there's some agreement been reached with the landlord to extend as part of a wider settlement.  The latter probably thinks that there's more likely to be more return from the property with a new tenant than leaving it empty and is also guaranteed some return from the sale of the business towards arrears etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Roger Mexico said:

Well it was previously said that there were only two years on the current lease, so presumably there's some agreement been reached with the landlord to extend as part of a wider settlement.  The latter probably thinks that there's more likely to be more return from the property with a new tenant than leaving it empty and is also guaranteed some return from the sale of the business towards arrears etc.

Yes, I can see that, but as the landlord why would you give a longer lease to a tenant that was already in default?  You would just give a longer lease to the new tenant who probably wouldn't want to buy the company with the debts.   Unless part of the settlement was that the company was handed over to the landlord. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My assumption would be that the landlord has recognised he can’t get blood out of a stone, that second hand gym equipment isn’t worth much on its own, and that it’s better to cooperate with the tenant to sell as a fitted out gym, with equipment, and a book of customers. That way the tenant/gym business owner may get something, rather than nothing.

On the other hand it’s only the gym business owner who has listed. Nothing from the landlord. Could be just clutching at straws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, thommo2010 said:

HSBC putting in a planning application for where monsoon is currently located so looks like another business going

Well I was right about the move to Strand Street, just the wrong property!

Given Doug B owns HSBC House, I imagine they want to distance themselves.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Gladys said:

Yes, I can see that, but as the landlord why would you give a longer lease to a tenant that was already in default?  You would just give a longer lease to the new tenant who probably wouldn't want to buy the company with the debts.   Unless part of the settlement was that the company was handed over to the landlord. 

It's chicken and egg, no new tenant is going to want to buy the business with only a couple of years guaranteed use on it (some of the earnings are from sub-leases, so it's not even as if moving elsewhere will be without loss).  The longer lease will only be available to a new tenant as relations have clearly broken down with the old one.  But obviously any sane buyer of the business is going to treble-check everything with the landlord in writing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Roger Mexico said:

It's chicken and egg, no new tenant is going to want to buy the business with only a couple of years guaranteed use on it (some of the earnings are from sub-leases, so it's not even as if moving elsewhere will be without loss).  The longer lease will only be available to a new tenant as relations have clearly broken down with the old one.  But obviously any sane buyer of the business is going to treble-check everything with the landlord in writing.

The business was for sale a few years ago. A friend of mine looked at it at the time. I’m not sure anyone wants to be long term committed to that lease to be fair. 

Edited by offshoremanxman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, offshoremanxman said:

The business was for sale a few years ago. A friend of mine looked at it at the time. I’m not sure anyone wants to be long term committed to that lease to be fair. 

Quite.  Presumably the extension will have to be more realistic than is rumoured the current situation is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...