Jump to content

Firm closing


finlo

Recommended Posts

Isn't there a bit of law that says legal tender cannot be refused in settlement of a debt?  Probably long changed by subsequent legislation, but there is also something in the back of my mind about buses not having to give you change if you can't give the correct amount. 

Probably both situations are partly true and partly myth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Gladys said:

Isn't there a bit of law that says legal tender cannot be refused in settlement of a debt?  Probably long changed by subsequent legislation, but there is also something in the back of my mind about buses not having to give you change if you can't give the correct amount. 

Probably both situations are partly true and partly myth. 

And you can write “cheques” on eggs and the side of a cow apparently. Or that’s what I remember being told during my A level Law studies. Probably not totally correct either.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Gladys said:

Isn't there a bit of law that says legal tender cannot be refused in settlement of a debt?  Probably long changed by subsequent legislation, but there is also something in the back of my mind about buses not having to give you change if you can't give the correct amount. 

Probably both situations are partly true and partly myth. 

I think 'in settlement for a debt' is key here, as opposed to making a purchase or similar transaction where no contract has been entered into?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Harry Lamb said:

I think 'in settlement for a debt' is key here, as opposed to making a purchase or similar transaction where no contract has been entered into?

I wouldn’t have thought so.

Surely a debt arises as a result of a contract? ( I can’t immediately think of any circumstances where it wouldn’t)
 

I contract to give you £10 and you contract with me that you will repay it.

We have a contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, The Voice of Reason said:

I wouldn’t have thought so.

Surely a debt arises as a result of a contract? ( I can’t immediately think of any circumstances where it wouldn’t)
 

I contract to give you £10 and you contract with me that you will repay it.

We have a contract.

If you go to the pub and ask for a pint. Then you pay before it's handed over you have neither a debt nor a contract. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Gladys said:

Are you sure? You have a contract that the other party has failed to fulfill, so the debt is on their side. 

Ha Ha. AFAIK There is no contract. Neither written or deemed. Unless you drink the drink then refuse to pay. 

Maybe if you had a tab perhaps. 

Whatever, I am sure that seller can insist on whatever payment type he wants. 

Edited by Happier diner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Voice of Reason said:

And you can write “cheques” on eggs and the side of a cow apparently. Or that’s what I remember being told during my A level Law studies. Probably not totally correct either.

I think that is theoretically true, essentially a cheque is just an instruction to your bank that you hand to your creditor in discharge of a debt, but there is legislation covering cheques specifically. If it is written on an eggshell it isn't a cheque I suppose, but still an instruction.

Will have to do some Googling. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Happier diner said:

Ha Ha. AFAIK There is no contract. Neither written or deemed. Unless you drink the drink then refuse to pay. 

Maybe if you had a tab perhaps. 

Whatever, I am sure that seller can insist on whatever payment type he wants. 

From the mists of my memory, there is a contract where there is offer, acceptance and consideration.   So, you ask for a pint (offer), pay (consideration) and if the money is taken by the barman there is acceptance and he now has to fulfill his side of the bargain. Of course, an offer can be withdrawn before acceptance, and the barman is not bound to accept your money, so no contract. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gladys said:

Isn't there a bit of law that says legal tender cannot be refused in settlement of a debt?  Probably long changed by subsequent legislation, but there is also something in the back of my mind about buses not having to give you change if you can't give the correct amount. 

Probably both situations are partly true and partly myth. 

Piers Corbyn says so.......

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Gladys said:

From the mists of my memory, there is a contract where there is offer, acceptance and consideration.   So, you ask for a pint (offer), pay (consideration) and if the money is taken by the barman there is acceptance and he now has to fulfill his side of the bargain. Of course, an offer can be withdrawn before acceptance, and the barman is not bound to accept your money, so no contract. 

And then there is the” invitation to treat” business.

As in Boots v Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, if I remember correctly. Or the other way round.

When you take an item up to the till you are making an offer to purchase which the retailer accepts by taking your money.

Something like that anyway.

Edited by The Voice of Reason
Addition of last sentence para 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, The Voice of Reason said:

And then there is the” invitation to treat” business.

As in Boots v Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, if I remember correctly. Or the other way round.

When you take an item up to the till you are making an offer to purchase which the retailer accepts by taking your money.

Something like that anyway.

Yes, I had that in mind.  It was the Pharmaceutical Soc suing Boots for selling self service medicines rather than through a dispensing staff member, they lost as the contract was made at the till.  The display of goods with prices etc was an invitation to treat or make an offer which could be refused at the till.   There was another case about a knife being on display, can't remember that one in detail, but it was the same point.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gladys said:

Yes, I had that in mind.  It was the Pharmaceutical Soc suing Boots for selling self service medicines rather than through a dispensing staff member, they lost as the contract was made at the till.  The display of goods with prices etc was an invitation to treat or make an offer which could be refused at the till.   There was another case about a knife being on display, can't remember that one in detail, but it was the same point.  

Fisher v Bell I believe

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...