Jump to content

Manx alcohol measure reduced from 27.5ml to 25ml


jackwhite

Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, John Wright said:

27.5 is the metric equivalent of 1/5th gill 

The article refers to the current measure as being 28.4 ml

"An amendment put forward by the Office of Fair Trading proposes spirits are served in quantities of 25ml, rather than 28.4ml (one fluid ounce) as it is currently.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AOR said:

I would have thought 30ml would have been the better option.

I think that the major problem is the supply of optics. As far as I know, no one makes 30 ml optics that are government stamped. So changing to a size no one makes would not help the problem. If you chose 50 ml optics as std you would probably send a lot of extra drivers over the drink drive limits. 

35 ml is an alternative and optics are made in that size. They are used throughout the UK and indeed the IOM rejected both 25 ml and 35 ml some years ago as they wanted to keep a point of difference from anywhere else. 

Edited by emesde
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, John Wright said:

Why? It’s not metricisation. It’s standardisation. Measures used to be imperial

England 1/6th gill

IoM         1/5th gill

Scotland 1/4th gill

they were standardised at 25, 27.5 and 30ml during metricisation.

We are a very small, limited market using 27.5. Manufacturers have stopped making them at 27.5. So we had to change. It was announced 3 or 4 years ago.

i know it's not your maths but if a 4th of something is 30 how can a 6th be 25 ? surely it should be 20 ?????

Edited by WTF
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WTF said:

i know it's not your maths but if a 4th of something is 30 how can a 6th be 25 ? surely it should be 20 ?????

It should have read 25, 27.5 and 35 as the metric equivalents of 1/6, 1/5 and 1/4. They weren’t precise conversions.

But it’s the non availability of the 1/5 gill measures that is the driver.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, John Wright said:

Why? It’s not metricisation. It’s standardisation. Measures used to be imperial

England 1/6th gill

IoM         1/5th gill

Scotland 1/4th gill

they were standardised at 25, 27.5 and 30ml during metricisation.

We are a very small, limited market using 27.5. Manufacturers have stopped making them at 27.5. So we had to change. It was announced 3 or 4 years ago.

Genuine question. 
 

Couldn’t a manx company have done it and earned a few quid? 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jackwhite said:

Genuine question. 
 

Couldn’t a manx company have done it and earned a few quid? 

You mean make the measures what do you think, could they invest thousands of pounds to produce a small quantity for a limited market

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, alpha-acid said:

You mean make the measures what do you think, could they invest thousands of pounds to produce a small quantity for a limited market

Go ahead invest yourself if you think it's profitable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, emesde said:

Serious question. 

In your heading you used the 27. 5 ml as the current size of optics yet the article refers to it as 28.4 ml

Every conversion table says 28.4 so was just interested where the 27.5 comes from. 🤔

It is 28.4 I would imagine a metric conversion that did not work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, alpha-acid said:

It is 28.4 I would imagine a metric conversion that did not work

Yes I can see its not a nice round figure, but we have never used optics  of 27.5 ml and never seen any anywhere. We used optics measured as fifth of a gill and every single optic had to be checked by iom weights and measures dept and government stamped and sealed. The reason being that the suppliers could not get them stamped in the UK as fifth of a gill was not a permitted legal spirit measure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...