HiVibes Posted July 10, 2022 Share Posted July 10, 2022 8 hours ago, AOR said: Have you ever seen Stu Peters and HQ in the same room? Just sayin' like. It would be a big fucking room. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Passing Time Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 52 minutes ago, Roxanne said: No need. His posts remind me of a certain poster that was banned... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 1 hour ago, Passing Time said: His posts remind me of a certain poster that was banned... Yes, almost visceral in his hatred. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Voice of Reason Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 14 minutes ago, Gladys said: Yes, almost visceral in his hatred. But not the only one. See postings re Ashford and Johnson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Passing Time Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 4 minutes ago, The Voice of Reason said: But not the only one. See postings re Ashford and Johnson They deserve everything they get TBH Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoops Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 On 7/10/2022 at 12:15 AM, Stu Peters said: HQ and I don't like one another, but I have to say that if he was running a business that was eligible for a support grant and he got it, then he's entitled to it and we shouldn't complain. If he influenced the grant scheme for personal gain, or made a fraudulent claim he should be called out for it - but I expect he recused himself when any conflicts of interest arose. I thought skelly and quayle were present at the meetings where 100% compensation for blokes with multiple houses was discussed? anyway, I was referring to how much public money he and his ilk will have been in receipt of because they own a lot of land and buildings, and comparing that to cut backs to public services. Mind you, I can't really complain, if I was rich and powerful i would write the rules to suit me as well................. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cissolt Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 9 minutes ago, Hoops said: I thought skelly and quayle were present at the meetings where 100% compensation for blokes with multiple houses was discussed? anyway, I was referring to how much public money he and his ilk will have been in receipt of because they own a lot of land and buildings, and comparing that to cut backs to public services. Mind you, I can't really complain, if I was rich and powerful i would write the rules to suit me as well................. Well HQ did say that it was all minuted when he left the meetings so I guess and FOI would show all the times it was discussed and who was present Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Mexico Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 On 7/10/2022 at 12:15 AM, Stu Peters said: HQ and I don't like one another, but I have to say that if he was running a business that was eligible for a support grant and he got it, then he's entitled to it and we shouldn't complain. If he influenced the grant scheme for personal gain, or made a fraudulent claim he should be called out for it - but I expect he recused himself when any conflicts of interest arose. But of course that's not how these things work. Obliging civil servants arrange matters so that 'nice things' are done for Ministers (or their mates or influential constituents) without them ever having to advocate for it publicly. Naturally they (usually) withdraw from the meetings where such matters are approved, but by then everything has been sorted to their advantage. Nothing can normally be proved, because there is nothing in writing, unless someone whistleblows. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kopek Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 So Stu will be getting what? Some free stamps? Yeahhhh! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forestboy Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 30 minutes ago, Kopek said: So Stu will be getting what? Some free stamps? Yeahhhh! Green Shield ones. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Peters Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 Ah, I remember the days. 5 gallons of five star with 5 shots of Redex and double Green Shield stamps. Jumpers for goalposts (etc). 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Voice of Reason Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 33 minutes ago, Stu Peters said: Ah, I remember the days. 5 gallons of five star with 5 shots of Redex and double Green Shield stamps. Jumpers for goalposts (etc). Going up to the local newsagents at ten years old to get my mum ten Players No 6 cigarettes and a box of matches. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 3 minutes ago, The Voice of Reason said: Going up to the local newsagents at ten years old to get my mum ten Players No 6 cigarettes and a box of matches. Ew, a bit common, Embassy every time!🙃 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
De nada Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 6 minutes ago, Gladys said: Ew, a bit common, Embassy every time!🙃 Could have been worse, Players No 10's or even Sovereign! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 1 minute ago, De nada said: Could have been worse, Players No 10's or even Sovereign! Beyond the pale! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.