Jump to content

Alf Cannan's I Have A Dream


Dirty Buggane

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, The Voice of Reason said:

It’s a little thing and maybe I shouldn’t really mention it but a lot of the time “England” is used as a term for the “ United Kingdom” which it shouldn’t really be.

And I say this as an English born person 

You're quite right too, although the more pertinent point is that it's rarely the political nirvana many people seem to think it is when drawing the comparison either. 

English politics is more often than not a poor example of governance, often the worst in the UK and not something we should be aspiring too. They're often outliers in UK or world terms.

To suggest the integrity of the ruling Tory party is anything better than our leaders is complete rubbish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, english zloty said:

Away from the antics, did you see Alf got voted down over the HR report. That never happens. 

The extraordinary thing is that Christian had actually to bring a motion to force the publication of a report that had been promised 18 months ago.  But if you want to see what a dreadful mess the Government HR is in you only need to look at the reply to a Written Question a few days ago.  Wannenburgh had simply asked: When the annual report of the Public Services Commission will be published.

The Minister for the Cabinet Office (Ms Lord-Brennan): Due to changes in the membership of the Public Services Commission and senior officers, a review of the format and content of the Public Services Commission (PSC) Annual Reports was undertaken. On this basis work is underway to combine the 2022 and 2023 reports and the combined report will be finalised for approval by Public Services Commission in January 2024.

Now the Annual Report of the PSC is some that should be legally laid before Tynwald every year and has been for decades if you include the PSC's predecessors.  It basically tells you how many public employees there are and all the HR-related statistics and so on and what the HR Department has been doing in the last year.  Producing it is the most basic and regular activity that the department should do.

And it's normally published fairly soon after the end of the financial year.  So the one for 2020-21 was laid before Tynwald in July 2021.  And with previous such reports is available from here.

But that's the last one we've seen.  By now we should have had separate ones for 2021-22 and 2022-23.  The excuses given above are meaningless.  You don't change the format of such reports if possible because it makes year to year comparisons less useful.  Unless you're trying to hide stuff.  And the head of HR left 18 months ago and the Department should have been able to produce such reports on autopilot anyway.

These people are basically admitting they're either too incompetent to carry out even their most basic functions or too crooked to tell us what they do do.  Possibly both

Edited by Roger Mexico
Typo
  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Roger Mexico said:

The extraordinary thing is that Christian had actually to bring a motion to force the publication of a report that had been promised 18 months ago.  But if you want to see what a dreadful mess the Government HR is in you only need to look at the reply to a Written Question a few days ago.  Wannenburgh had simply asked: When the annual report of the Public Services Commission will be published.

The Minister for the Cabinet Office (Ms Lord-Brennan): Due to changes in the membership of the Public Services Commission and senior officers, a review of the format and content of the Public Services Commission (PSC) Annual Reports was undertaken. On this basis work is underway to combine the 2022 and 2023 reports and the combined report will be finalised for approval by Public Services Commission in January 2024.

Now the Annual Report of the PSC is some that should be legally laid before Tynwald every year and has been for decades if you include the PSC's predecessors.  It basically tells you how many public employees there are and all the HR-related statistics and so on and what the HR Department has been doing in the last year.  Producing it is the most basic and regular activity that the department should do.

And it's normally published fairly soon after the end of the financial year.  So the one for 2020-21 was laid before Tynwald in July 2021.  And with previous such reports is available from here.

But that's the last one we've seen.  By now we should have had separate ones for 2021-22 and 2022-23.  The excuses given above are meaningless.  You don't change the format of such reports if possible because it makes year to year comparisons less useful.  Unless you're trying to hide stuff.  And the head of HR left 18 months ago and the Department should have been able to produce such reports on autopilot anyway.

These people are basically admitting they're either too incompetent to carry out even their most basic functions or too crooked to tell us what they do do.  Possibly both

I remember hearing "a story" years ago of the regular removal of an annual HR Report from the due intended process which would have ended with said Report in front of Tynwald members.

Almost as though some people have something to hide....Although Stu Peters has been justifying the increase in Govt numbers on another thread, too.

Edited by Non-Believer
Extra bit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Roger Mexico said:

These people are basically admitting they're either too incompetent to carry out even their most basic functions or too crooked to tell us what they do do.  Possibly both

And KLB just regurgitates the tosh she's given without challenge. Sadly, this hardly makes her unique among our elected / unelected representatives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, A fool and his money..... said:

You're quite right too, although the more pertinent point is that it's rarely the political nirvana many people seem to think it is when drawing the comparison either. 

English politics is more often than not a poor example of governance, often the worst in the UK and not something we should be aspiring too. They're often outliers in UK or world terms.

To suggest the integrity of the ruling Tory party is anything better than our leaders is complete rubbish.

Yes, the English are rubbish. They just pay all the bills for benefits in the rest of the UK that they don't get.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, littlebushy said:

 

3 minutes ago, Zulu said:

AFUERA! 

Edited by The Phantom
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah yes, we'll ask the opinion of those whose employment terms are benefitted by their having even more people working under them.

A mere £3M more for an extra 54 fat arses pushing pens, paperclips and paper in endless, self-justifying circles whilst our craven elected bend over backwards to accommodate them.

 

Screenshot_20231214-130105_Samsung Internet.jpg

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...