Bombay Bad Boy Posted May 19, 2023 Share Posted May 19, 2023 8 hours ago, The Phantom said: Does anyone think the readers of the Sun would travel to the 'Galapagos of the British Isles'? https://www.thesun.co.uk/travel/22385339/isle-man-basking-sharks-wallabies-wildlife-british/?utm_source=social&utm_medium=linkedin "The rising cost of holidays means more people are considering vacations closer to home this summer." *Looks at cost of getting to Island. *Flies to Malaga. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted May 19, 2023 Share Posted May 19, 2023 We went on a wallabee spotting walk one evening. We saw loads. But isn't there an issue with inbreeding? Have to say some didn't look the healthiest. Perhaps over time inbreeding eventually rights itself in that the 'bad' genes eventually die out because of the lower survival rate of the individuals with them, but I'm not a geneticist. Not sure that an inbred colony of any kind of non-indigenous animal is something to be proud of. However, I would not be in favour of a cull. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asitis Posted May 19, 2023 Share Posted May 19, 2023 They need controlling and a large number culling. I am sure we could get some hunter type tourists here to do it and pay for the privilege . On a serious note a chap who knows an awful lot about conservation told me of the hidden damage they cause all the way down the food chain and into plant life as well. Now there are these numbers its probably far removed from the amusement factor they provided. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two-lane Posted May 19, 2023 Share Posted May 19, 2023 https://www.lenah.com.au/wallaby-for-home-cooks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Mexico Posted May 19, 2023 Share Posted May 19, 2023 10 minutes ago, Gladys said: And that is just one area. There are reports of sightings elsewhere and quite a way down south. I'm a bit more dubious that there are colonies anywhere else on the Island. I suspect we're seeing individuals exploring, but there's nowhere as suitable elsewhere. We'd probably see more concentrated sightings if there were. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted May 19, 2023 Share Posted May 19, 2023 Just now, Roger Mexico said: I'm a bit more dubious that there are colonies anywhere else on the Island. I suspect we're seeing individuals exploring, but there's nowhere as suitable elsewhere. We'd probably see more concentrated sightings if there were. I can only go by reports of "I saw a wallabies in Colby". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bombay Bad Boy Posted May 19, 2023 Share Posted May 19, 2023 4 minutes ago, Two-lane said: https://www.lenah.com.au/wallaby-for-home-cooks What part of a red-necked wallaby can't you eat? the banjo. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forestboy Posted May 19, 2023 Share Posted May 19, 2023 20 minutes ago, Ativa said: Spotted in Ramsey, Onchan and Dalby that I am aware of. There are loads of them and I guess they will become an issue on the not too distant future Then It’ll be full time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forestboy Posted May 19, 2023 Share Posted May 19, 2023 Just now, forestboy said: Then It’ll be full time. CULL time 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlebushy Posted May 19, 2023 Share Posted May 19, 2023 29 minutes ago, Gladys said: We went on a wallabee spotting walk one evening. We saw loads. But isn't there an issue with inbreeding? Have to say some didn't look the healthiest. Perhaps over time inbreeding eventually rights itself in that the 'bad' genes eventually die out because of the lower survival rate of the individuals with them, but I'm not a geneticist. Not sure that an inbred colony of any kind of non-indigenous animal is something to be proud of. However, I would not be in favour of a cull. Is the second paragraph referring to wallabies or Ramsey? 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted May 19, 2023 Share Posted May 19, 2023 3 minutes ago, littlebushy said: Is the second paragraph referring to wallabies or Ramsey? Take your pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCallig Posted May 19, 2023 Share Posted May 19, 2023 Maybe it's time to import a pair of red squirrels and a couple of unrelated male wallabies just to freshen things up a bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forestboy Posted May 19, 2023 Share Posted May 19, 2023 9 minutes ago, littlebushy said: Is the second paragraph referring to wallabies or Ramsey? Probably Foxdale. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted May 19, 2023 Share Posted May 19, 2023 1 minute ago, McCallig said: Maybe it's time to import a pair of red squirrels and a couple of unrelated male wallabies just to freshen things up a bit. Have thought the same for the wallabies. Not sure about red squirrels, the law of unintended consequences would apply. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Mexico Posted May 20, 2023 Share Posted May 20, 2023 Not strictly related to the Vacuous Plan (but neither are wallabies) but IOM Newspapers reported a rather telling incident in Tynwald this week: Cannan's bid to cut the number of questions MHKs can ask is thwarted by his colleagues The chief minister's bid to limit the number of questions politicians can ask in the House of Keys and Tynwald was voted down by his colleagues, At this week's Tynwald sitting, Alfred Cannan put forward an amendment, moving that a member may table a maximum of four questions for oral answer for any sitting. He said this should help members ‘consolidate their thoughts’ and ‘provide much greater direction for the house’, and would ‘arguably provide better value to the taxpayers’. It would lead to a better quality of questions being delivered to government,’ Mr Cannan said. ‘It would ensure that those backbenchers with arguably important questions are not drowned out by multiple questions being put on that order paper.’ The amendment was however, voted against, with three for and 20 against in the Keys, and two for in the Legislative Council and seven against. The interesting thing is that he lost so badly. Clearly he can't just demand whatever he wants of the top of his head and expect obedience from many people. Like his statement on Ranson, it shows just how bad he is at reading the room. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.