Jump to content

Sam Tarry


Recommended Posts

Sam Tarry has been sacked from Labours frontbench for joining a picket line.

What on earth is going on with that party? Have they forgotten who begat them?

Does Starmer think that Labour supporters view this as acceptable or is it just another sign of the Labour party’s lurch to the right?

He should cross the floor and join the Tories and let Angela Rayner  represent 
this once proud socialist party.

The man Starmer is a disgrace.

 

Edited by The Voice of Reason
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/27/2022 at 10:43 PM, The Voice of Reason said:

Sam Tarry has been sacked from Labours frontbench for joining a picket line.

What on earth is going on with that party? Have they forgotten who begat them?

Does Starmer think that Labour supporters view this as acceptable or is it just another sign of the Labour party’s lurch to the right?

He should cross the floor and join the Tories and let Angela Rayner  represent 
this once proud socialist party.

The man Starmer is a disgrace.

 

He wasn't sacked for "joining a picket line". There's never been anything wrong with a politician doing that.

He was sacked after a TV interview in which he said that the Labour party supported the strike, an opinion that reflects badly on a party trying to look like a government-in-waiting and which, in Starmer's eyes, makes the voting public think that a Labour government would bring the country to its knees. Starmer said that Tarry was making up party policy that doesn't exist, "on the hoof". That is why he got rid of him.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RoundTheCourse said:

He wasn't sacked for "joining a picket line". There's never been anything wrong with a politician doing that.

Well you would like to think so. But according to PK’s beloved Guardian Starmer told shadow ministers not to join a picket line.

Other media report the same and  talk of Tarry defying Starmer’s instructions by joining the picket line.

So make of that what you will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, The Voice of Reason said:

Well you would like to think so. But according to PK’s beloved Guardian Starmer told shadow ministers not to join a picket line.

Other media report the same and  talk of Tarry defying Starmer’s instructions by joining the picket line.

So make of that what you will.

All shadow ministers were told not to join  a picket line.  Several did anyway but only Tarry has been "sacked" as a shadow minister because of those TV Interviews.

The rest haven't really faced any repercussions so once again you are wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, manxman1980 said:

All shadow ministers were told not to join  a picket line.  Several did anyway but only Tarry has been "sacked" as a shadow minister because of those TV Interviews.

The rest haven't really faced any repercussions so once again you are wrong.

Actually once again I am right.

Round the Course stated that there was nothing wrong with a politician joining a picket line. Starmer obviously had other ideas as he told his shadow ministers not to do so.

Other Labour MP have joined the picket lines in support of Tarry but just because others have joined picket lines and not been sacked that doesn’t mean that Tarry wasn’t sacked for being on a picket lines.

It is often the case that where there are numerous transgressors in any situation, only one or two face repercussions, either for pragmatic reasons or to make an example of them. So I don’t think you can claim that because others have not been sacked for an act, that one was, that particular act wasn’t the reason for the sacking.

Starmer seems to have shot himself in the foot with this sacking. As the Guardian reports:- “ up to 70 Labour MP,s may join pickets as Starmer faces test of party unity”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, The Voice of Reason said:

If you say so.

Glad you're finally seeing sense.

Yes Sam Tarry was sacked for lining up various interviews afterwards where Labour Party policy was sort-of made up as he went along. A colleague of his has remarked that he was earmarked for possible deselection and wanted to be sacked to get his old job back.

But the fun bit for me is this load of old nonsense:

On 7/27/2022 at 10:43 PM, The Voice of Reason said:

Does Starmer think that Labour supporters view this as acceptable or is it just another sign of the Labour party’s lurch to the right?

He should cross the floor and join the Tories and let Angela Rayner  represent this once proud socialist party.

Ah yes, Angela Rayner - the main squeeze of - Sam Tarry...!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...