hissingsid Posted October 19, 2022 Share Posted October 19, 2022 How do you know that ? They could all be on the dole or job seekers or each having five kids that would need educating etc. you cannot count chickens the here and now is what we have to deal with. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0bserver Posted October 19, 2022 Share Posted October 19, 2022 15 minutes ago, hissingsid said: Dave did not actively encourage Trevor and his Mrs to have five children when they are paying a ridiculous amount of rent that requires two wages to furnish. Trevor is already getting child allowance, free education, free healthcare etc for his five children so is certainly getting a good deal as a tax payer. And this is why we're on the verge of population collapse. Well, collapse of a functioning societal population. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wavey Davey Posted October 19, 2022 Share Posted October 19, 2022 3 minutes ago, HeliX said: If the Government weren't so shit at retaining our young then the taxpayer would be getting a great deal from Trevor's 5 kids (in a few years time). Trevor is definitely banging Dave’s wife. So very shortly the taxpayer is going to be paying for Trevor’s 5 kids to be partially supported by the state after Mrs Trevor kicks Trevor out and he has to go and live with Mrs Dave in a two bed flat Peel with Mrs Dave’s kids when she gets kicked out by poor old Dave. This means that have to drive to both Ramsey and Douglas each day to work. Dave then becomes the winner again as he’s had his pay rise and only has to pay child support in future whereas Trevor has to pay for his 5 kids as well as the main costs for Mrs Dave and her kids and the rent in their new flat in Peel. Trevor eventually has a heart attack due to all the stress. And Dave and Mrs Dave ultimately reconcile while he’s in hospital. And all because Trevor didn’t get that pay rise when Dave did! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hissingsid Posted October 19, 2022 Share Posted October 19, 2022 If anyone thinks having five children under 10 is a good idea without having sufficient funds to provide for them they are irresponsible at best. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asthehills Posted October 19, 2022 Share Posted October 19, 2022 1 minute ago, hissingsid said: If anyone thinks having five children under 10 is a good idea without having sufficient funds to provide for them they are irresponsible at best. You are massively missing the point which was that and arbitrary figure on what someone earns can’t be used to determine if they need more help or a pay rise or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hissingsid Posted October 19, 2022 Share Posted October 19, 2022 No the point is why should people expect a pay rise because of their personal circumstances. A pay rise should be given for good performance the rest is immaterial. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeliX Posted October 19, 2022 Share Posted October 19, 2022 7 minutes ago, hissingsid said: If anyone thinks having five children under 10 is a good idea without having sufficient funds to provide for them they are irresponsible at best. I know someone who had one kid, tried for another and ended up with triplets. Presumably they should've had 2 of them put down. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeliX Posted October 19, 2022 Share Posted October 19, 2022 15 minutes ago, hissingsid said: How do you know that ? They could all be on the dole or job seekers or each having five kids that would need educating etc. you cannot count chickens the here and now is what we have to deal with. Law of averages. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asthehills Posted October 19, 2022 Share Posted October 19, 2022 2 minutes ago, hissingsid said: No the point is why should people expect a pay rise because of their personal circumstances. A pay rise should be given for good performance the rest is immaterial. You need to re read the last couple of pages. Put the beer down. Stop hissing and go to bed, Sid 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BriT Posted October 20, 2022 Share Posted October 20, 2022 8 hours ago, Asthehills said: You need to re read the last couple of pages. Put the beer down. Stop hissing and go to bed, Sid You really are quite an unpleasant addition to this forum. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banker Posted October 20, 2022 Author Share Posted October 20, 2022 8 hours ago, HeliX said: I know someone who had one kid, tried for another and ended up with triplets. Presumably they should've had 2 of them put down. Probably a teacher trying for 3 lots of maternity leave 😂 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meoir Shee Posted October 20, 2022 Share Posted October 20, 2022 1 minute ago, Banker said: Probably a teacher trying for 3 lots of maternity leave 😂 Ha ha, 3 lots of maternity leave for triplets, that is so funny, brilliant. What a shame no other occupation allows for maternity leave, only teachers, maybe other workers should join together to improve their terms and conditions, maybe forming a union of people in the same trade, maybe call it a Union of Trade or something? I blame the teachers. 🤡 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BriT Posted October 20, 2022 Share Posted October 20, 2022 (edited) I’m just watching Mick Lynch on BBC Breakfast being interviewed about the railway workers strike. It’s like watching the 1971 film “Carry on at your convenience” with the ridiculous dated communist language they use to describe their workers struggle. These people are literally clowns still living in the 1970s. Everything is owned by an elite based in global tax havens according to thick Mick. Edited October 20, 2022 by BriT 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banker Posted October 20, 2022 Author Share Posted October 20, 2022 48 minutes ago, BriT said: I’m just watching Mick Lynch on BBC Breakfast being interviewed about the railway workers strike. It’s like watching the 1971 film “Carry on at your convenience” with the ridiculous dated communist language they use to describe their workers struggle. These people are literally clowns still living in the 1970s. Everything is owned by an elite based in global tax havens according to thick Mick. Same language as CWU leaders & Unite, expect money to come from nowhere whilst they keep outdated practices costing everyone a fortune!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apple Posted October 20, 2022 Share Posted October 20, 2022 12 hours ago, Asthehills said: Absolute nonsense. Probably right...maybe though the Big Banks profits of £33 billion might help one or two people out, after they have paid out their new bonuses and dividends. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.