Jump to content

Please Sir can I have more!!


Banker

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, BriT said:

I’m just watching Mick Lynch on BBC Breakfast being interviewed about the railway workers strike. It’s like watching the 1971 film “Carry on at your convenience” with the ridiculous dated communist language they use to describe their workers struggle. These people are literally clowns still living in the 1970s. Everything is owned by an elite based in global tax havens according to thick Mick. 

The picture with this post remind me of the series of "Boys from the Black Stuff" tv programme. I hope we are not headed back to a recession where jobs were so hard to come by. There is speculation that we are. Can it be avoided ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Apple said:

The picture with this post remind me of the series of "Boys from the Black Stuff" tv programme. I hope we are not headed back to a recession where jobs were so hard to come by. There is speculation that we are. Can it be avoided ?

It can’t be avoided no. We are heading back to around the early 1980s from what I can see. The only upside will be that it might toughen a few wokes up and get them focused on serious matters not crying about pronouns. Blame covid and Brexit for obliterating our economy. Hopefully next time a government proposes shutting everything down for a year because some old folk might die they’ll be laughed at. 

Edited by BriT
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, BriT said:

It can’t be avoided no. We are heading back to around the early 1980s from what I can see. The only upside will be that it might toughen a few wokes up and get them focused on serious matters not crying about pronouns. Blame covid and Brexit for obliterating our economy. Hopefully next time a government proposes shutting everything down for a year because some old folk might die they’ll be laughed at. 

The amount of money being sucked out of the global economies by huge multi-nationals and their "elite" and then salted away is a problem though, particularly when it's so easy for them to practice tax avoidance on it. This money has had to come from somewhere and that somewhere is the middle earners and the poor often paying for life's essential commodities. It's thus effectively being taken out of circulation, leaving those lower echelons (and Govts) with less and less to play with. But we on IoM can't complain, we've played and are still playing our part in the process...

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Non-Believer said:

The amount of money being sucked out of the global economies by huge multi-nationals and their "elite" and then salted away is a problem though, particularly when it's so easy for them to practice tax avoidance on it. This money has had to come from somewhere and that somewhere is the middle earners and the poor often paying for life's essential commodities. It's thus effectively being taken out of circulation, leaving those lower echelons (and Govts) with less and less to play with. But we on IoM can't complain, we've played and are still playing our part in the process...

That’s the other part of the covid mess. We paid these corporations billions so that they didn’t lay off staff due to a failed political pandemic response. Millions of businesses were paid just to keep people at home on payroll. Now those corporations are ramping up prices to make up for lost earnings. That’s what’s largely driving inflation as well as the energy crisis. Suppliers are setting their own prices to try to enhance profits. It’s all artificial and goes back to a failed covid response. The end result will be a reversion to the early 1980s with big job losses, high interest rates, and a general malaise that nobody under 40 will have seen before. Add Brexit on top and it’s a complete cluster****.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact remains that the public sector unions are demanding more money than can be afforded by the public purse so that’s only going to lead to job losses or cuts in services plus higher taxes to fund them.

you can see this already starting in UK with Royal Mail 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Banker said:

The fact remains that the public sector unions are demanding more money than can be afforded by the public purse so that’s only going to lead to job losses or cuts in services plus higher taxes to fund them.

you can see this already starting in UK with Royal Mail 

Does your ideological stance extend to RBS/NatWest ( still 48% government owned )?.

How does your stance relate to Royal Mail, a 100% privately owned company?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, John Wright said:

Does your ideological stance extend to RBS/NatWest ( still 48% government owned )?.

How does your stance relate to Royal Mail, a 100% privately owned company?

Yes it applies to all companies, NatWest & all major financial institutions have a pay pot each year eg5% which is distributed according to performance & how high you are up on salary bands so a high performing member may get 7/8% whilst a low performing highly paid member May get 0% . If we applied this to public sector it would be much more efficient 

Royal Mail needs a major modernization of processes & working practices similar to railways, docks etc which is opposed by unions.

Personally would support much higher pay rise for frontline health & care workers 

Edited by Banker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Banker said:

Personally would support much higher pay rise for frontline health & care workers 

But that's more money than can be afforded by the public purse so that’s only going to lead to job losses or cuts in services plus higher taxes to fund them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, HeliX said:

But that's more money than can be afforded by the public purse so that’s only going to lead to job losses or cuts in services plus higher taxes to fund them.

Cuts should come from other areas of public sector if necessary, already 20% vacancies in health. Personally I would increase NI thresholds so higher earners pay more NI to help fund health.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
38 minutes ago, fredtosser said:

Lots of rumblings (Via Ballakermeen) that full strikes are incoming

Heard the same.  It will be an absolute disgrace if they do and impact on kids education PLUS leave people already struggling with childcare issues and unable to work.

 

Edited by Asthehills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, fredtosser said:

Lots of rumblings (Via Ballakermeen) that full strikes are incoming

We’ll see , the plonkers won’t do that as no pay, they’d rather be as disruptive as possible & get paid!!

See how they like it in UK with a public sector pay freeze coming 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...