Jump to content

Please Sir can I have more!!


Banker

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Meoir Shee said:

I am aware this is the UK legislation, I would imagine the IoM statute is very similar.  Are you suggesting a government minister actively break employment law?

Obviously she can’t, but if she did I think the small number of teachers who actually will strike would be surprised how much support she would get from the general public and a lot of their colleagues who are feeling bullied by the hobby union.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Asthehills said:

Obviously she can’t, but if she did I think the small number of teachers who actually will strike would be surprised how much support she would get from the general public and a lot of their colleagues who are feeling bullied by the hobby union.

“Obviously she can’t, but if she did”???

Any progress on why higher wages fuel inflation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Meoir Shee said:

“Obviously she can’t, but if she did”???

Any progress on why higher wages fuel inflation?

yes. as wages go up the cost of producing/delivering products/services go up.

please, please move the conversation along!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Banker said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-isle-of-man-63516679
 

details of offer & strike action, the Union not accepting offer have 600 members of which 400 voted in last ballot with c325 in favour of strike action so c52% which is hardly massive endorsement!!

Also NAUSWT haven’t put latest offer to members 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-isle-of-man-63010102

82% of those re-balloted supported strike action

325 is not 52% of 600

Sloppy work. Must try harder. Please show your working out

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Newbie said:

When did it become possible to fire people for taking part in legally organised industrial action? Are you saying they should be fired for having the temerity to ask for a wage commensurate with what they had 10 years ago, or should they be fired for standing up to the government? 

Sorry, I should have said make their positions redundant. 

I'm saying they should be let go for acting like absolute clowns.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Asthehills said:

Obviously she can’t, but if she did I think the small number of teachers who actually will strike would be surprised how much support she would get from the general public and a lot of their colleagues who are feeling bullied by the hobby union.

I think it is a stretch to say that many of the public and/or teachers would support the illegal sacking of employees because they are in a pay dispute. Have you been chatting to Jacob Rees-Mogg?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 0bserver said:

Sorry, I should have said make their positions redundant. 

I'm saying they should be let go for acting like absolute clowns.

Redundancy should only be used where;

- all or part of an organisation is closing

- there is a reduction of work of a particular kind

- the work has changed location 

Now which of the above would you care to suggest apply to your suggestion? 

Arguably you could offer new terms and conditions and dismiss those that do t accept the new terms but that is not a good look (ask P&O) and can come at a significant cost in the form of settlement agreements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...