Jump to content

Climate Change Progress Report


Moghrey Mie

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Banker said:

The current world fleet of cruise ships are not climate friendly and due to the long time it takes to pay back a £billion/ £multi million build cost they are not going to be scrapped any time soon. (30 + years life expectancy for a big Butlins on sea)

Are you thick?

ETA Don't answer that, there is no need.

Edited by Blade Runner
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Blade Runner said:

The current world fleet of cruise ships are not climate friendly and due to the long time it takes to pay back a £billion/ £multi million build cost they are not going to be scrapped any time soon. (30 + years life expectancy for a big Butlins on sea)

Are you thick?

ETA Don't answer that, there is no need.

But you said there weren’t any green ships, you were proved wrong as normal!!

I said old ships are similar to old cars for emission.

You really are a thicko who’s probably been banned from Essex forums!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moghrey Mie said:

Yes I thought ORSTED (formerly DONG ENERGY) already had an option to build an offshore wind farm back in 2014 but it's not in IOM waters.

https://www.gov.im/about-the-government/departments/infrastructure/harbours-information/territorial-seas/proposed-developments-in-uk-waters-which-may-impact-on-isle-of-man/walney-extension-offshore-wind-farm/

They had an agreement signed with the IOMG back in 2015 (it's within the 12 mile limit).  I've always thought it very strange that we've heard so little since - including from those within government always banging on about their green credentials.   Whether the continued grip on government policy by the MUA's gas beneficiaries is responsible I wouldn't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Roger Mexico said:

They had an agreement signed with the IOMG back in 2015 (it's within the 12 mile limit).  I've always thought it very strange that we've heard so little since - including from those within government always banging on about their green credentials.   Whether the continued grip on government policy by the MUA's gas beneficiaries is responsible I wouldn't know.

Yes That's correct. And if DONG/ORSTED have such a wealth of information why have we waited 8 years for any progress to be reported? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Manxman1234 said:

Yet still encourage cruise ships to come here which are one of least green modes of transport, 

So you don’t want Tourists coming over on planes and increasing the carbon burn on the IOM while here either?

Why don’t we put a stop to all travel , shut the world economy  down and become good green Marxists .

Just Stop Everything!!!!

FFS

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Blade Runner said:

Why not just someone like a MHK call the company installing offshore windfarms in the Irish sea and ask how much it would cost to put in an extra 10 for the IOM?

For one they will not get the CFDs from the UK government which the offshore wind farms are dependant on . The windfarms lease the seabed from the UK Gov and in return the UK guarantee a minimum fixed price to the developer .

The UK gov will currently not pay for CFDs for offshore windfarm in manx territorial waters .

Oestad must be hoping / betting that the rules and regs change and the UK gov will change their policy and pay CFDs to windfarms outside UK waters .

Without this happening The offshore Oestad wind farm will not happen . That is why they estimate 8 years in the hope that UK legislation changes .

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Banker said:

LNG is not climate friendly. No better than burning oil. Yes, less polluting but no better on CO2 emissions which is the title of the thread. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/15/2023 at 3:43 PM, Mercenary said:

Sulfur dioxide has a cooling effect on climate. The recent ban/restrictions on shipping have increased warming.

 

Sulfur dioxide is however a significant source of air pollution (mostly separate issue to climate change)

WTF is sulfur dioxide?

You mean Sulphur Dioxide

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
13 minutes ago, Banker said:

Jersey offering big subsidies for electric vehicles etc, perhaps this would be better use of climate change funds here 

https://jerseyeveningpost.com/news/2023/08/30/grants-available-for-electric-cars-vans-mopeds-and-motorbikes-in-jersey/

We are opting for the stick over carrot approach.  15 minute villages and electric buses.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...