Passing Time Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 36 minutes ago, Catrisk said: At least I’m not a fraud or a fake politician who has to attract attention to himself 24/7 for a variety of noisy fake causes. So remind us all again, when was it you were sacked by DBC? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roxanne Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 27 minutes ago, Passing Time said: So remind us all again, when was it you were sacked by DBC? It's more simple than that. This is all still about Albert banning some posters. It's a grudge, pure and simple and an attempt to get back at Amadeus, Tatlock and MF. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoTailT Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Roxanne said: It's more simple than that. This is all still about Albert banning some posters. It's a grudge, pure and simple and an attempt to get back at Amadeus, Tatlock and MF. To be honest Roxanne, Albert also banned me for a month because of drumming on about building control uncoverings, despite it being in the public press and outlets. I understand why some people are holding grudges, I'm personally well past it. Edited March 17, 2023 by NoTailT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roxanne Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 9 minutes ago, NoTailT said: To be honest Roxanne, Albert also banned me for a month because of drumming on about building control uncoverings, despite it being in the public press and outlets. I understand why some people are holding grudges, I'm personally well past it. You weren’t happy but you recognised that it was out of your control and you just got on with it. You didn’t become vindictive, create several new user names and become inflammatory on purpose. I’m glad to hear you’re well past it. It’s better for you and your well-being. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoTailT Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 10 minutes ago, Roxanne said: You weren’t happy but you recognised that it was out of your control and you just got on with it. You didn’t become vindictive, create several new user names and become inflammatory on purpose. I’m glad to hear you’re well past it. It’s better for you and your well-being. I usually find Bushy's is better for me and my well-being. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 3 hours ago, Catrisk said: Aside from your good self there’s only one internet big mouth here and that’s Councilor Frank who has to court a Twitter audience with inane shite 24/7 to draw attention to himself. Look I’m at a shit airport it’s so shit, oh look I’m at a shit EV charging point it’s so shit someone should do something about it. Look at me I’m speaking to someone on a roundel its shit etc etc. It’s just a shame he doesn’t do the same in relation to his own massive political and operational short comings and to the allegations of fraud leveled at the public authority he’s a member of. The very definition of a one-dimensional, two-faced, attention seeking internet shouty man really. Okay ex Council employee enjoying your pension Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 1 minute ago, Satan666 said: Okay ex Council employee enjoying your pension Andy or Eddie, I’m not too sure🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catrisk Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 (edited) 2 hours ago, Roxanne said: It's more simple than that. This is all still about Albert banning some posters. It's a grudge, pure and simple and an attempt to get back at Amadeus, Tatlock and MF. What a completely ridiculous conspiracy theory. I have expressed an honest opinion about the fraud of a councilor who seems to use his own platform to slag off everything to do with the IOM but who appears to not like to be challenged about anything he might be responsible for. Simple as. No different and no better than the political Pygmy that is Michael Josem. The IOM is full of them. Edited March 17, 2023 by Catrisk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amadeus Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 3 hours ago, Catrisk said: What a completely ridiculous conspiracy theory. I have expressed an honest opinion about the fraud of a councilor who seems to use his own platform to slag off everything to do with the IOM but who appears to not like to be challenged about anything he might be responsible for. Simple as. No different and no better than the political Pygmy that is Michael Josem. The IOM is full of them. Ok, you need to tone it down. I told you and your other sock puppet personas repeatedly where my line is. When it gets to legal territory fun time’s over. You have now repeatedly accused me of being involved in fraud. That’s crossing it. Why people like you think they have a good given right to abuse a private forum for your anger filled rants is beyond me but you’re not continuing. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Passing Time Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 6 hours ago, Roxanne said: It's more simple than that. This is all still about Albert banning some posters. It's a grudge, pure and simple and an attempt to get back at Amadeus, Tatlock and MF. Banning goes with the territory, they should suck it up and get over it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Tatlock Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 5 minutes ago, Passing Time said: Banning goes with the territory, they should suck it up and get over it Indeed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTeapot Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 Prepare yourself for a flood of 'new' angry accounts going crazy 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HiVibes Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 15 minutes ago, Passing Time said: Banning goes with the territory, they should suck it up and get over it Neil down, get over it and suck it up surely? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Passing Time Posted March 18, 2023 Share Posted March 18, 2023 37 minutes ago, HiVibes said: Neil down, get over it and suck it up surely? Oh so original and predictable… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrGarrison Posted March 18, 2023 Share Posted March 18, 2023 (edited) 10 hours ago, Amadeus said: Ok, you need to tone it down. I told you and your other sock puppet personas repeatedly where my line is. When it gets to legal territory fun time’s over. You have now repeatedly accused me of being involved in fraud. That’s crossing it. Why people like you think they have a good given right to abuse a private forum for your anger filled rants is beyond me but you’re not continuing. Nobody needs to tone anything down Councillor. Although yet again you can’t respond coherently so you ban any account that dares to question your motivation in running this forum and start the same ludicrous threats of legal “things”. Like Allan Bell when confronted with Peter Karan’s claims of “institutional corruption” you choose to deliberately misunderstand the meaning of the word fraud. In this situation it relates to a person or thing intended to deceive others typically by unjustifiably claiming or being credited with certain accomplishments or qualities. Which is exactly what you are doing by claiming credit for being some sort of open progressive council member whilst clearly being nothing of the sort at all. How is the investigation going into the building controllers? How are the problems with waste disposal and the civil amenity site going? Has that bloke got his disgusting mold ridden flat cleaned yet? Douglas looks a complete state like some sort of poorly funded third world cesspit. Your only response so far has been to post pictures of the airport on Twitter and make accusations at the DOI rather than provide answers to Douglas ratepayers about how your own shoddy, dirty, incompetent little empire is being managed. That’s deliberate deception. That’s unjustifiably claiming credit for something that isn’t so. That’s pure deflection by switching to accusations of the competence of others as a deliberate distraction whilst clearly suppressing questions surrounding the competence of the agency that you yourself sit on. So basically in plain English terms it’s painting a fraudulent perception of what is really going on. When will you be effectively dealing with issues to do with Douglas Council and it’s failings rather than constantly throwing mud at other government agencies on social media? Edited March 18, 2023 by MrGarrison 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.