Jump to content

Active Travel


Stu Peters

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Non-Believer said:

That'll be an, "I'm voting for" then Stu?

As a Departmental member you'll be effectively obliged to do so anyway, regardless of any previous opinions expressed, including publishing figures on these boards indicating that only a small percentage of VED raised is actually spent on the roads.

If, as you suggest, cycle lanes and active travel have to be paid for then why not forward a motion obliging cyclists to pay a contribution towards these facilities?

It’s not just Stu suggesting cycle lanes and active travel have to be paid for.It’s common knowledge. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read through the report, some interesting discussion apart from Stu Peters' responses which sounded really backward and ranty. 

1 hour ago, Dirty Buggane said:

I have nothing whats so ever to do with cycling and active travel, so why should I have to pay for it. I am already paying and may I say handsomely for my car travel, why should I subsidise some beardie in a hair shirt and lycra.

Not this one again ! All goes in the same tax pot, whether it's cigarettes, alcohol, VAT on anything you buy, or vehicle excise duty. Everyone who pays tax in any form pays for the roads, and for the cycleways, and for the hospitals and schools. The VAT that the cyclist paid on his lycra is paying for the roads too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Bastard said:

Read through the report, some interesting discussion apart from Stu Peters' responses which sounded really backward and ranty. 

Not this one again ! All goes in the same tax pot, whether it's cigarettes, alcohol, VAT on anything you buy, or vehicle excise duty. Everyone who pays tax in any form pays for the roads, and for the cycleways, and for the hospitals and schools. The VAT that the cyclist paid on his lycra is paying for the roads too.

Well that would be a fair point if it was compulsory to purchase Lycra. But you can cycle the roads without wearing it. The connection is therefore tenuous at best.

Whereas the poor motorist is compelled  by law to pay VED (or whatever it’s called these days)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, The Voice of Reason said:

Well that would be a fair point if it was compulsory to purchase Lycra. But you can cycle the roads without wearing it. The connection is therefore tenuous at best.

Whereas the poor motorist is compelled  by law to pay VED (or whatever it’s called these days)

Buying a bicycle generates VAT, which is spent on the roads. In fact, buying groceries, heating oil, shoes all generate tax which is spent on the roads. It's also not compulsory to be a motorist. 

Edited by The Bastard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Non-Believer said:

That'll be an, "I'm voting for" then Stu?

As a Departmental member you'll be effectively obliged to do so anyway, regardless of any previous opinions expressed, including publishing figures on these boards indicating that only a small percentage of VED raised is actually spent on the roads.

If, as you suggest, cycle lanes and active travel have to be paid for then why not forward a motion obliging cyclists to pay a contribution towards these facilities?

It was a tongue-in-cheek comment, but again I realise that humour is apparently to be discouraged. But yes, I'll vote for the rise as we need to offset losses like the 6-month tax offer.

As a departmental member I have the freedom to vote according to any previously-stated position. My previous question on motor taxation covered VED and fuel duties, and revealed that only a small proportion of it went on maintaining (or improving) our roads. I'm delighted that electric cars will be charged, as I think it's only fair, and fairness is something that is sadly lacking as far as motorists and taxation are concerned. Engine size and emissions are blunt tools in applying road tax, so what might work better? Weight of vehicle? Purchase price?

We'll never convince anyone to impose road tax (or insurance etc) on cyclists so it's a battle I'll avoid as unwinnable.

Edited by Stu Peters
Addendum
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, The Bastard said:

Buying a bicycle generates VAT, which is spent on the roads. In fact, buying groceries, heating oil, shoes all generate tax which is spent on the roads. It's also not compulsory to be a motorist. 

Oh No. I have been using a lettuce to get to work on. I thought it got me there free of road tax. DOH!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, cissolt said:

How were the increased figures decided?  It seems to be punishing people for small engine sizes, what considerations were given to the extra cost on families?

Emissions play a part in all this and I think there has been a discussion about it being unfair to tax electric vehicles whilst allowing small ICE vehicles cheaper RFL/VED/road tax. Those with small engines may suffer a proportionally higher rise, but we petrolheads will suffer far more in actual cash terms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Stu Peters said:

Engine size and emissions are blunt tools in applying road tax, so what might work better? Weight of vehicle? Purchase price?

Vehicle weight and mileage covered. That covers wear on the roads and pollution. User pays - the more you use, the more you pay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Stu Peters said:

It was a tongue-in-cheek comment, but again I realise that humour is apparently to be discouraged. But yes, I'll vote for the rise as we need to offset losses like the 6-month tax offer.

As a departmental member I have the freedom to vote according to any previously-stated position. My previous question on motor taxation covered VED and fuel duties, and revealed that only a small proportion of it went on maintaining (or improving) our roads. I'm delighted that electric cars will be charged,

Yep - they need to be charged regularly.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...