english zloty Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 If of course they even had access to the land, which they dont 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Get a life Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 13 hours ago, offshoremanxman said: What was said isn’t actually true the executed share holder agreement is online and clearly sets out the funding arrangement which is not as described in the post above. I take your point, I probably should have worded it better. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thommo2010 Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 This won't get off the ground, much like the cinema complex on Lord Street. I'll believe it when I see it 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Onchan Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 9 minutes ago, offshoremanxman said: If it’s the same Andy Malone who owns the Nags Head it likely won’t go well. I wouldn’t mess with him. Why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2112 Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 (edited) 14 minutes ago, offshoremanxman said: If it’s the same Andy Malone who owns the Nags Head it likely won’t go well. I wouldn’t mess with him. Don Corleone? Horses Head? What will probably pan out is he will be offered alternative premises on an industrial estate - take it or leave it. Assistance provided to prevent further negative publicity. Edited January 26, 2023 by 2112 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0bserver Posted January 26, 2023 Author Share Posted January 26, 2023 Good to see it going before planning soon. I had thought it would be stuck in an eternal public consultation. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2112 Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 1 minute ago, 0bserver said: Good to see it going before planning soon. I had thought it would be stuck in an eternal public consultation. It will be passed without any real objections, as it’s a major test of IOMG policy. Consultation will be disregarded. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Onchan Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 2 hours ago, offshoremanxman said: Won’t take shit off anyone. Really? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
offshoremanxman Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 1 hour ago, Andy Onchan said: Really? Not sure where we’re going on this. A really nice guy but not the sort to take shit off government or anyone else. It could get interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hissingsid Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 I hope it gets permission and the chap on MR this morning gets his finger out out his perception that it will take three years or perhaps up to five did not impress me much. Talk about lack of initiative and urgency. We need some reasonably priced accommodation and we need it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hissingsid Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 You are not in favour obviously but that does not mean this won’t get built for a scheme of this size 3 million is not a big ask. However we will see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0bserver Posted January 26, 2023 Author Share Posted January 26, 2023 5 minutes ago, offshoremanxman said: This isn’t a brownfield site Technically it is. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
english zloty Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 48 minutes ago, 0bserver said: Technically it is. no it isn't. the old school might be, because it is unoccupied, for example, but not the entire site which includes active business and inhabited bungalows as so many others of stated Park Road is a no brainer, it has planning permission is true brownfield and owned entirely by one landowner. 2-3 years later there is a mixed use development. this site will end up going beyond appeal to a planning inquiry at my guess. and won't provide any housing in number for 4-5 years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
english zloty Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 6 hours ago, offshoremanxman said: If it’s the same Andy Malone who owns the Nags Head it likely won’t go well. I wouldn’t mess with him. tis - says so in the video Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banker Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 1 hour ago, offshoremanxman said: I’m massively in favour of our brownfield sites being developed by the MDC. This isn’t a brownfield site and this isn’t a site that fits in with their actual remit. I can imagine that if this goes ahead it would cost much less than £30M to complete easy. All for 130 resi units with no parking and 20,000 sq ft of commercial with no parking. You’re a typical Manx crab against anything new & always whining about Government, DBC etc but the sort who never says anything in public, never stands for office , never attended public meetings etc This is a perfect brownfield development 1 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.