Jump to content

Westmoreland Village


0bserver

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, randyandy said:

The negativity when anyone tries to make progress on this post little island is embarrassing!

Do you think that money spent if it is 3 million will generate more or less than 3million in additional income across the whole site when it’s complete?  Of course it will.  More property to sell or rent and the properties will also be more attractive because they won’t have scabby old buildings in the middle of the development.

Its great new for Douglas and don’t worry about Park Road as that will be following soon 

Just demolish most of Upper Douglas and it will be a blank canvas for development. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, C Montgomery Burns said:

The more you deal with planning on this island you realize that half of them are just lazy or egotistical, and the other half of them are on the take. 

It’s just wrong. They need to employ more from private sector, people who genuinely can make a difference, want to and have no axe to grind  / power trip. According to the bin lorry driver I was speaking with last week, he said that’s exactly what DBC have just employed. Said they’re already starting to shake it up but they’ve got a lot of obstacles to get over. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Satan666 said:

According to the bin lorry driver I was speaking with last week, he said that’s exactly what DBC have just employed. Said they’re already starting to shake it up but they’ve got a lot of obstacles to get over. 

Oops!   Don’t mention DBC - I mentioned them once but I think I got away with it… 😉

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pitts was on Manx Radio this morning objecting to this plan because of lack of parking obviously some of his constituents in Hillside Ave and around about have been on to him.   Everyone does not drive or want to, lots of people cannot afford a car and these are the people hopefully that this village is aimed at.   If you consider a car essential then rent elsewhere if you are a cyclist, prepared to walk although there are busses passing through the proposed site then it is for you.    The complete negativity from people when any proposals are put forward is the very reason things don’t happen.  A roof over your head at a decent cost is a dream for some and I hope this plan comes to fruition.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hissingsid said:

Pitts was on Manx Radio this morning objecting to this plan because of lack of parking obviously some of his constituents in Hillside Ave and around about have been on to him.   Everyone does not drive or want to, lots of people cannot afford a car and these are the people hopefully that this village is aimed at.   If you consider a car essential then rent elsewhere if you are a cyclist, prepared to walk although there are busses passing through the proposed site then it is for you.    The complete negativity from people when any proposals are put forward is the very reason things don’t happen.  A roof over your head at a decent cost is a dream for some and I hope this plan comes to fruition.

Is the proposal that these dwellings won't be eligible for resident's passes on that basis? I think that was the case with the Brown Bobby flats, various apartments on the Prom (with garages) etc.

If not it's all well and good saying that but once built will be even more of a free-for-all for the resident's you've mentioned with potentially 300 additional cars or similar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Douglas is now a city 🤣 it is reasonable to promote buildings without parking provided, other cities do not have parking facilities on their doorstep.   I know a good many people who do not have cars, mostly elderly, and who is to say they won’t be interested in buying a unit and freeing up a large house which is becoming very expensive to heat and maintain and live near town.   There is a very good bus service serving Bucks Road and it would be easy for them to loop and pass the front doors of these units in fact some of the busses used to do this.   What is not to like no garden to worry about and a free bus pass to Douglas bus station and beyond or the Terrace etc.   Too much importance given to car spaces it is the accommodation that is badly needed.  Pandering to constituents should be discouraged Mr Pitts get the bins sorted and some decent lighting on the Promenade.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone is shouting use brown field sites but all the brown field sites have one thing in common they are in built up areas with limited or no parking…Park Road for example and if parking facilities are provided that will cut down on the amount of dwellings which will affect the viability of the whole project.    If you choose to live in a City this is the outcome.   Parking spaces are a privilege not a necessity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, hissingsid said:

Everyone is shouting use brown field sites but all the brown field sites have one thing in common they are in built up areas with limited or no parking…Park Road for example and if parking facilities are provided that will cut down on the amount of dwellings which will affect the viability of the whole project.    If you choose to live in a City this is the outcome.   Parking spaces are a privilege not a necessity.

under normal circumstances  a developer would not get planning permission  for a residential development unless he could meet the planning criteria , it would be an act of madness to permit  development in Douglas without  sufficient car parking  the criteria is laid down in the planning policy ,  parking on places like park road could easily provide on site parking  by building it underground of on the first floor , after all government own the site and the land value should not be part of the overall development costs ,  

by not providing  effective parking  ,all thats going to happen is the   neighbouring area will become gridlocked with vehicles  ,and ruin  the surrounding environment  which is not good planning !

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, hissingsid said:

Everyone is shouting use brown field sites but all the brown field sites have one thing in common they are in built up areas with limited or no parking…Park Road for example and if parking facilities are provided that will cut down on the amount of dwellings which will affect the viability of the whole project.    If you choose to live in a City this is the outcome.   Parking spaces are a privilege not a necessity.

the whole  ground floor could be parking with the accomodation built above

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...