Jump to content

Proposed Increase in Vehicle Duty


Major Rushen

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, hissingsid said:

So the proposed road tax hike isn’t on tomorrow’s list.    I wonder when it will get sneaked in.

Mine is due in late April...I hope that I'm able to save some money by paying  for it before this is implemented.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, hissingsid said:

So the proposed road tax hike isn’t on tomorrow’s list.    I wonder when it will get sneaked in.

Maybe it's been withdrawn because the roads are so good....?

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, mad_manx said:

Mine is due in late April...I hope that I'm able to save some money by paying  for it before this is implemented.

Just another thing that will blow Cannans 5000 mugs to be fleeced into the weeds!

Edited by finlo
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Roger Mexico said:

That's because tomorrow is a sitting of the House of Keys and (as Minster Thomas pointed out above) the Vehicle Duty Order is due to go before next week's sitting of Tynwald Court (item 26)

Is the outcome in any doubt? Has one politician stood up against it? No doubt we'll get Chris Turpin's faux sympathy. Wonder where that extra revenue will go as the highways are fine?

Not had a big idea from the DoI for while so we must be due one pretty soon. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Major Rushen said:

I think it was tipped out the last time.

It was withdrawn before it got to the sitting, under Baker's jurisdiction if my memory serves me. Would have seen workmen's vans paying well over £500 to tax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, hissingsid said:

Thomas needs to withdraw this too if he wants another term in Tynwald .    His popularity is waning as it is remember Anne Corlett got more votes than him last time. 

If it’s withdrawn then budget will be cut in other areas like planned roads improvements, maybe harbors etc . Thomas has already stated this will happen as the money has to come from somewhere else

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Non-Believer said:

It was withdrawn before it got to the sitting, under Baker's jurisdiction if my memory serves me. Would have seen workmen's vans paying well over £500 to tax.

Didn't Rob try and push it through and had to acknowledge he hadn't read it?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It could come from the money saved form NOT doing the roads because they are in such good condition.

 

They either are - or they ain't.  They need fixing (badly) or they don't.

Stop spending on shite jobs on the road network like raised crossings, shite dangerous road crossings, wrong coloured road crossing and piss poor dressings.

 

  • Thanks 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...