Jump to content

Manx Development Corporation - gov unaccountability again?


360 View

Recommended Posts

And its announced in the Budget this week that another unaccountable body will get public funds … https://gef.im/2023/02/21/how-will-mdc-pay-its-bills/

MDC is “owned by taxpayer”, will have to borrow “on commercial terms” (from treasury or otherwise, and presumably joe public pays the interest on the loans for MDC), nothing about what happens to profits (LOL) from this government scheme.

And can we find out who manages it (undoubtedly some grandiose title), who selected the manager,  how many staff it has, who pays them, how much they get paid or find out anything about its operation?

Can we hell! It’s an ‘arm’s length’ body, but not included in the freedom of information scheme … transparency at its most opaque, unless, just for once, gov does the right thing and adds it to the list for foi …. Not holding breath

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, 360 View said:

And its announced in the Budget this week that another unaccountable body will get public funds … https://gef.im/2023/02/21/how-will-mdc-pay-its-bills/

MDC is “owned by taxpayer”, will have to borrow “on commercial terms” (from treasury or otherwise, and presumably joe public pays the interest on the loans for MDC), nothing about what happens to profits (LOL) from this government scheme.

And can we find out who manages it (undoubtedly some grandiose title), who selected the manager,  how many staff it has, who pays them, how much they get paid or find out anything about its operation?

Can we hell! It’s an ‘arm’s length’ body, but not included in the freedom of information scheme … transparency at its most opaque, unless, just for once, gov does the right thing and adds it to the list for foi …. Not holding breath

Your google skills are weak.

Why would you expect to know peoples salary?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not googled anything yet, thanks, just read news item … and salary .. well, if paid by government would expect to be able to find out at least what pay brackets they are in … but as Treasury is sole shareholder ….. 

 

 

Edited by 360 View
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 360 View said:

Not googled anything yet, thanks, just read news item … and salary .. well, if paid by government would expect to be able to find out at least what pay brackets they are in … but as Treasury is sole shareholder ….. 

 

 

Then I would suggest you look at their website.

Government don’t pay the salaries, in the same way they don’t pay the wages of people working on the Ben

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 360 View said:

And its announced in the Budget this week that another unaccountable body will get public funds … https://gef.im/2023/02/21/how-will-mdc-pay-its-bills/

MDC is “owned by taxpayer”, will have to borrow “on commercial terms” (from treasury or otherwise, and presumably joe public pays the interest on the loans for MDC), nothing about what happens to profits (LOL) from this government scheme.

And can we find out who manages it (undoubtedly some grandiose title), who selected the manager,  how many staff it has, who pays them, how much they get paid or find out anything about its operation?

Can we hell! It’s an ‘arm’s length’ body, but not included in the freedom of information scheme … transparency at its most opaque, unless, just for once, gov does the right thing and adds it to the list for foi …. Not holding breath

Round about £120k for the MD and at least three roles at £60k. All publicly advertised. The MD job is supposed to be a three year limited appointment. I think Dandara provided the office space. As I recall Treasury / Tynwald have given MDC around £5million so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Katman said:

This will be handy for you https://mdc.im/faq/ it says they publish their accounts, so you should find many of their answers in there.

The accounts only tell you limited information and you still have to pay to view the corporate records in Companies Registry.

Why should we pay for something that we, the taxpayer, already own and are entitled to know?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You weren't the guy at the Budget Breakfast were you?

He had a pre-prepared speech for question time and wanted to take up the whole alloted time himself, on this which is a small point of the whole thing, even if there is some merit in what's being said. The truth is, I don't know one way or another, having not looked at it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Andy Onchan said:

The accounts only tell you limited information and you still have to pay to view the corporate records in Companies Registry.

Why should we pay for something that we, the taxpayer, already own and are entitled to know?

“If” in five years this has generated significant profit and returned a number of schemes that have provided more amenities, housing and resulted in the introduction of some new building methods to the island - people will still be moaning.

There is loads of info publicly available.  Give them a chance and see what happens.

People might be pleasantly surprised.

”If” in three years there is no sign of any progress on schemes or profit, and for some reason they then renew contracts etc and start pumping more money into it, then that would be the time to start moaning.  Not now when they haven’t had a chance to achieve anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 360 View said:

And its announced in the Budget this week that another unaccountable body will get public funds … https://gef.im/2023/02/21/how-will-mdc-pay-its-bills/

MDC is “owned by taxpayer”, will have to borrow “on commercial terms” (from treasury or otherwise, and presumably joe public pays the interest on the loans for MDC), nothing about what happens to profits (LOL) from this government scheme.

And can we find out who manages it (undoubtedly some grandiose title), who selected the manager,  how many staff it has, who pays them, how much they get paid or find out anything about its operation?

Can we hell! It’s an ‘arm’s length’ body, but not included in the freedom of information scheme … transparency at its most opaque, unless, just for once, gov does the right thing and adds it to the list for foi …. Not holding breath

Change your name to Limited View...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Asthehills said:

“If” in five years this has generated significant profit and returned a number of schemes that have provided more amenities, housing and resulted in the introduction of some new building methods to the island - people will still be moaning.

There is loads of info publicly available.  Give them a chance and see what happens.

People might be pleasantly surprised.

”If” in three years there is no sign of any progress on schemes or profit, and for some reason they then renew contracts etc and start pumping more money into it, then that would be the time to start moaning.  Not now when they haven’t had a chance to achieve anything.

Is MDC charged by Treasury with making a profit? Somehow I doubt it. Cost recovery perhaps.

nd as far as your last paragraph is concerned by the time we get to that stage it will be too late and any funding handed over to maintain those sorts of salaries will have been for nowt, except to the individuals concerned. The people heading up this "department", whoever they are (I don't know any of them and have no wish to) probably can't believe their luck if they fail.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Asthehills said:

“If” in five years this has generated significant profit and returned a number of schemes that have provided more amenities, housing and resulted in the introduction of some new building methods to the island - people will still be moaning.

There is loads of info publicly available.  Give them a chance and see what happens.

People might be pleasantly surprised.

”If” in three years there is no sign of any progress on schemes or profit, and for some reason they then renew contracts etc and start pumping more money into it, then that would be the time to start moaning.  Not now when they haven’t had a chance to achieve anything.

In part you have a point, but unfortunately so far, the MDC have been given a free ride, and have the protection of Government, in the way that the Quango (arms length) has been set up. Would any other developers have had an easy ride, especially with planning? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, NoTailT said:

Have seen that Sean Gilbert meeting with Raj Chatha a few times over last few months and some other developers. I sugget accountability is going to be lacking.

Not sure what that’s got to do with anything, they probably have mutual interests outside MDC!

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...