Jump to content

Laxey in the Sea


x-in-man

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Banker said:

It shouldn’t but lots seem to think they should sort it out, garff commissioners can sort if they like rather than closing public shelters!!

Garff say only IOMG has the resources to deal with it, but DOI says 'no interest' in stabilising the cliff.  Not sure what that means, is it because they CBA, or they have no legal power to undertake the works?

ETA or do they mean the contractor and landowner have no interest without legal action?  It is not a clear paragraph, probably due to inexpert paraphrasing of the letter. 

It is going to be a right muddle between the landowner, contractors and householders.  You would hope they would sit down together and agree a plan, but that kind of pragmatism doesn't happen when large sums and insurers are involved. 

Edited by Gladys
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, doc.fixit said:

So the householders are on their own as govt. washes its hands? Examiner this week.

TBF, why should govt get involved if it is not their liability?  Even if they did whatever work voluntarily, eithout liability etc. on the basis that they be refunded when the insurance pays out, it puts public monies at risk. 

It could also set a precedent for the future.  

They can give as much assistance to facilitate the work that has to be done, certainly, like swift approval of planning consent if needed, but nothing more than that, IMHO.  

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Roxanne said:

You might laugh @hissingsid but the shelter is open and it is full of people having a wonderful time in the sun - and NO mess. 

That’s really good news, isn’t it? 

Or would you prefer some bad news? 

There are also extra tables on the grass areas either side of the cafe. It looks great and is a definite improvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Banker said:

Government, via a certain unqualified Minister, gave authority for this to go ahead.

No authority, no go ahead, no landslide.

They are as culpable as any other party.

Standard and predictable Govt spiel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Non-Believer said:

Government, via a certain unqualified Minister, gave authority for this to go ahead.

No authority, no go ahead, no landslide.

They are as culpable as any other party.

Standard and predictable Govt spiel.

Who was this unqualified minister/geotechnical engineer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...