Andy Onchan Posted April 25, 2023 Share Posted April 25, 2023 12 hours ago, Roger Mexico said: What will happen is that the questions will all be answered together, but because the three of them have asked one, they will each be guaranteed at least two more supplementary ones, just after the initial answer and at the end of the discussion "I refer the honourable member to my previous answer"...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cissolt Posted April 25, 2023 Share Posted April 25, 2023 What was Rob trying to get at in his little speech? It was very confusing to listen to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banker Posted April 25, 2023 Share Posted April 25, 2023 5 minutes ago, cissolt said: What was Rob trying to get at in his little speech? It was very confusing to listen to Presumably trying to show he was excluded from decision making. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roxanne Posted April 25, 2023 Share Posted April 25, 2023 I don't understand why these questions were asked Toby. This info was already in the public domain courtesy of one of the reports and discussed by Paul and Chris in their follow up video. I was hoping that the questions tabled were going to result in some new information coming forward. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cissolt Posted April 25, 2023 Share Posted April 25, 2023 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Roxanne said: I don't understand why these questions were asked Toby. This info was already in the public domain courtesy of one of the reports and discussed by Paul and Chris in their follow up video. I was hoping that the questions tabled were going to result in some new information coming forward. The question of who provided the legal advice to Alf wasn't in the public domain, we now know the conflicted AG pushed for the appeal. Edited April 25, 2023 by cissolt Of not is 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roxanne Posted April 25, 2023 Share Posted April 25, 2023 1 minute ago, cissolt said: The question of who provided the legal advice to Alf wasn't in the public domain, we now know the conflicted AG pushed for the appeal. Ah - I missed that bit - I only heard the news report on MR at lunchtime. So- the AG's office is still all powerful and used to getting it own way hey? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cissolt Posted April 25, 2023 Share Posted April 25, 2023 5 minutes ago, Roxanne said: Ah - I missed that bit - I only heard the news report on MR at lunchtime. So- the AG's office is still all powerful and used to getting it own way hey? MR filtered out that part, I suspect the aim of the question was to expose this and have it on the public record. Paul Moulton will no doubt be making a new video on the topic. What is the recourse for a conflicted AG acting above it's remit? Is providing legal advice in this situation a breach of the law or just ethics? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roxanne Posted April 25, 2023 Share Posted April 25, 2023 Just now, cissolt said: What is the recourse for a conflicted AG acting above it's remit? The precedent seems to be recruiting and employing another twenty advocates. 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hissingsid Posted April 25, 2023 Share Posted April 25, 2023 Chris Thomas must have been getting stick from his constituents over the proposed airport charges he has put them on hold for more comments 😆 . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x-in-man Posted April 25, 2023 Share Posted April 25, 2023 I am still of the opinion that Alf would throw his own family under the bus before admitting to anything. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forestboy Posted April 25, 2023 Share Posted April 25, 2023 Just now, hissingsid said: Chris Thomas must have been getting stick from his constituents over the proposed airport charges he has put them on hold for more comments 😆 . Proposed increased charges should be scrapped and a 1 hour free introduced on disc. Airport is fast becoming a very unfriendly place unlike days gone by. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
code99 Posted April 25, 2023 Share Posted April 25, 2023 8 minutes ago, forestboy said: The Isle of Man is fast becoming a very unfriendly place unlike days gone by. Fixed. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ativa Posted April 26, 2023 Share Posted April 26, 2023 Does anyone who what the answer re CRHS was? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moghrey Mie Posted April 26, 2023 Author Share Posted April 26, 2023 (edited) 22 hours ago, hissingsid said: Chris Thomas must have been getting stick from his constituents over the proposed airport charges he has put them on hold for more comments 😆 . There were lots of critical comments about Ronaldsway airport in Tynwald. Let's hope they get it sorted. Isn't there a technique called, 'management by walking about'? I think some of that is needed. Just take a look at what is happening and talk to the people involved. Edited April 26, 2023 by Moghrey Mie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zulu Posted April 26, 2023 Share Posted April 26, 2023 53 minutes ago, Ativa said: Does anyone who what the answer re CRHS was? The Minister can't give a timeline! https://www.manxradio.com/news/isle-of-man-news/minister-cant-give-timeline-for-work-to-replace-crhs/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.