Jump to content

Joney and the Bishop


hissingsid

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Kopek said:
4 hours ago, Andy Onchan said:

The Bishops stipend is paid from York ( I think).

.... but he is also paid as a member of Legco and that may be all or part of wage?

I'm sure I have heard in the past that the money is part of the reason the church retain the Diocese and have used it as a 'threat' to removing the bish?

The Bishop gets no salary from the government as part of his seat on LegCo.  He does seem to get a sum for 'expenses' which is currently around £8,000.  He doesn't get a pension from Tynwald either, like his salary that comes from the Church of England.

As for the threat that removing the Bishop from LegCo will mean that the post of the Bishop of Sodor and Man is abolished, I've heard this a lot over the years, but I'm not convinced it's a valid argument.  I suspect the real reason is more that it would require a lot of legal work to get rid of the post and the co-operation of Tynwald - which wouldn't be forthcoming.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, La_Dolce_Vita said:

They haven't done so at every parliamentary debate.  Aren't they understood to be guests to express a view on something that is fundamentally related to a motion? That, as you know, is different from a permanent position to debate and vote on everything.

The people you mention are/were members of the House of Lords not guests but debated along with all the others in that House.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Mr Helmut Fromage said:

What other kind of seals ? 
Stop talking in riddles and say it in words that make sense.

For the benefit of the Forum please clarify if you are one of Stansfields lot.

The seals found in Revelation.

No, I’m not a member of Living Hope Church. For information, religion and Christianity is my favourite subject but I’m not obsessive and won’t be evangelical on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Moghrey Mie said:

https://www.secularism.org.uk/news/2023/06/mps-to-debate-the-role-of-bishops-in-house-of-lords

This may produce a higher quality of debate than we had in Tynwald.

If there were none, or only a minority of members practicing true faith in any government, legislation would be founded on immorality, bribery, lying, deceit, hatred, self-serving and perversion, exactly what it seen in British politics and why “In March the Commission on Political Power said the bishops are an "anomalous" presence in the House of Lords”. 

Nothing motivates a secular member of government to be righteous and upstanding in modern politics. Those I’ve observed aren’t bothered about integrity, being judged or legacy and only care about accountability if they can get voted back in.

A bishop elder would have had some role/influence in Tynwald from the start judging by the keeills. Most young Manx don’t seem to care about this heritage, mainly visiting churches in the parish walk. Persecuted religious immigrants might like it though.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Malik said:

The seals found in Revelation.

No, I’m not a member of Living Hope Church. For information, religion and Christianity is my favourite subject but I’m not obsessive and won’t be evangelical on here.

You have my sympathy.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Malik said:

You’re a member? Oh, I am surprised. Yes they do have happy smiling faces in the photos I’ve seen. But I do as well.

Me too. All the more smiley through not being encumbered by nonsense like religion in any of its forms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, woolley said:

Me too. All the more smiley through not being encumbered by nonsense like religion in any of its forms.

I see. I didn’t know what you meant. Yes, it does seem there’s know freedom of speech on here and people cannot evangelise, not that I ever intended to in the first place. I only mentioned that because I was done for ‘spamming’ having read the rules upon joining. That’s fair enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Malik said:

I see. I didn’t know what you meant. Yes, it does seem there’s know freedom of speech on here and people cannot evangelise, not that I ever intended to in the first place. I only mentioned that because I was done for ‘spamming’ having read the rules upon joining. That’s fair enough.

Well there is freedom of speech, but the problem is when some people expound their unlikely beliefs about the nature of existence and creation as though they were fact, often coupled with a zeal that brooks no denial or even doubt. I appreciate you are not doing that, but it has been known in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...