Shake me up Judy Posted July 20, 2023 Share Posted July 20, 2023 If this goes any further then I'm sure the U.K media would be happy to pick it up, and that's where it will go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Mexico Posted July 20, 2023 Share Posted July 20, 2023 8 minutes ago, Two-lane said: Even a redacted version? But the more you redact, the less 'proof' it provides. In my experience media outlets are not likely to publish legal correspondence anyway - the Courts don't like their business being affected by publicity. Arkell v Pressdram is the exception not the rule. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoTailT Posted July 20, 2023 Share Posted July 20, 2023 12 minutes ago, Roger Mexico said: Well Moulton's tweet referred to "gatekeeper civil servants" which may be a reference to those who prevented Ranson's advice going to CoMin. This was from memory a committee of Randall, Davies, Greenhow, Magson and Lewin, though of course it would only need a majority of those to block the advice. So it's probably Ranson-related, but it may just be easier to use a private law firm for this sort of thing anyway - they're less likely to ask questions. Greenhow and Lewins name always cropping up in scandals eh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoTailT Posted July 20, 2023 Share Posted July 20, 2023 Hooper really is petulant, isnt he? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swoopy2110 Posted July 20, 2023 Share Posted July 20, 2023 Absolute joke of a thread that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shake me up Judy Posted July 20, 2023 Share Posted July 20, 2023 If they don't back off Moulton then they'll get their big story. We'll make sure of that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barlow Posted July 20, 2023 Share Posted July 20, 2023 4 hours ago, John Wright said: At best, and worst, he’s an enabler for those who think they’ve been disenfranchised. That’s really dangerous for society. Of course it is. Because it is society that has called the, erm, disenfranchisation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shake me up Judy Posted July 20, 2023 Share Posted July 20, 2023 John's post was a bit odd for a lawyer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Non-Believer Posted July 20, 2023 Share Posted July 20, 2023 He's a bloke with a camera who posts awkward videos asking awkward questions of tin pot, self-serving gobshites, both elected and unelected. The reaction is entirely predictable. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shake me up Judy Posted July 20, 2023 Share Posted July 20, 2023 We know what happened and how much it cost the last time they tried to bully someone and shut them up. If they want to go down that road again... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Non-Believer Posted July 20, 2023 Share Posted July 20, 2023 2 minutes ago, Shake me up Judy said: We know what happened and how much it cost the last time they tried to bully someone and shut them up. If they want to go down that road again... Well, they never learn lessons about anything else so all bets are off... 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackwhite Posted July 20, 2023 Share Posted July 20, 2023 That's shambolic from Hooper. I've noticed a certain condescending tone to his social media postings though, when he doesn't want to engage. A real arrogance. 6 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoTailT Posted July 20, 2023 Share Posted July 20, 2023 Just now, jackwhite said: That's shambolic from Hooper. I've noticed a certain condescending tone to his social media postings though, when he doesn't want to engage. A real arrogance. He has conducted himself like that on social media for quite some time. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two-lane Posted July 20, 2023 Share Posted July 20, 2023 51 minutes ago, NoTailT said: Hooper really is petulant, isnt he? FFFFFS! I saw that quote from Hooper on another thread, but thought that someone had done a bit of PaintShopping for a laugh, so I ignored it. But now I have seen it again, so went to check. He wrote that. He really, absolutely, wrote that. It is mind-boggling. Petulant is not even close. I hope I come face-to-face with him in the street. An email is not enough. Face-to-face with a big pointed finger. What an arsehole the man is. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banker Posted July 20, 2023 Share Posted July 20, 2023 Confidence in Alf’s administration at all time low, got to agree with Rob on that https://www.manxradio.com/news/isle-of-man-news/confidence-in-cannans-administration-at-an-all-time-low-says-mhk/ 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.