Jump to content

Windfarm could cost up to £40 million


Major Rushen

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, Moghrey Mie said:

Nobody has ever promised that electricity charges will reduce as a result of the wind farm.

No promises, true, but the inference has certainly been there with the "cheaper, greener" drive. However, many people will have interpreted this as meaning that prices will fall (an interpretation that suits the scheme's proponents just fine).

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Amadeus said:

Lower leccy cost is the only reason this could be even remotely considered and if that’s not happening then this needs to be shut down fast. 

I think ultimately it should end up in cheaper electricity. That will be when the capital cost is paid back. 

I have spent a lot of time in Europe this year. Wind farms everywhere. Holland, Belgium, Germany, France, Spain, Portugal, Italy, canaries. Not it's possible that all these places have got it wrong and it's not economically viable, but I doubt it. They have them because they are self financing as well as green. They are not perfect but given the isle of man is windier than all those places, surely it makes economic sense for us to have them too. 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Happier diner said:

I think ultimately it should end up in cheaper electricity. That will be when the capital cost is paid back.

MUA don't just have the capital cost of this installation to pay back though, there's the small question of the outstanding MEA debt as well. It may be a long time before the benefits of any cheaper generation will be felt by the consumer.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Non-Believer said:

MUA don't just have the capital cost of this installation to pay back though, there's the small question of the outstanding MEA debt as well. It may be a long time before the benefits of any cheaper generation will be felt by the consumer.

Indeed they do and that's part of the problem. Adding more debt to debt. It depends if you see the MUA as an isle of man thing or as a separate entity. Should we (or they) make decisions that are good for the IOM in the long term or just focus on their business.

My view is that onshore wind is a no brainer. How it's funded, well that's another issue. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Tinpot said:

It’s getting built so we may as well get used to it.

More specialists on island making plans and looking at details this last couple of weeks.

There is a major hurdle. Planning. Planning gives MHKs an opportunity to veto anything to save their seats. Remember Daffers and the Laxey sewage works. She sacrificed principle to run with the back and maintain her popularity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Happier diner said:

There is a major hurdle. Planning. Planning gives MHKs an opportunity to veto anything to save their seats. Remember Daffers and the Laxey sewage works. She sacrificed principle to run with the back and maintain her popularity. 

It will go through planning. Some NIMBYs will take it to appeal.  Appeal will be overturned and it will be built.

No question 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Planning will already be infected with the " green at any cost " virus, I wouldn't be surprised if it sails through !

TBH I would probably be more of a supporter if the scheme were to rid us of fossil fuel dependency, it wont, it will merely mean we have to run both side by side. Sort of the large scale equivalent of a hybrid car, where two systems need maintaining to ensure the system works, but the electric bit makes the owners feel green.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/15/2024 at 4:07 PM, Mercenary said:

Not about employment conditions more about potentially showing signs of predetermination and opening future decisions up to judicial challenge. 

https://www.channel103.com/news/jersey/ferry-operator-announcement-could-be-delayed/

"Economy Department Chief Officer Richard Corrigan ‘recused himself’ from the tender process for future ferry services after voting for DFDS in an online poll."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...