Jump to content

Benefits cheating


joebean

Recommended Posts

People who complain the loudest about benefit fraud, the most judgmental, are also people who have no fucking idea whatsoever about the reality of the situation. They scoff at the idea of paying it back at £10 a week taken from benefits because they do not understand what a punishment that actually is. 

Ignorant.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheTeapot said:

People who complain the loudest about benefit fraud, the most judgmental, are also people who have no fucking idea whatsoever about the reality of the situation. They scoff at the idea of paying it back at £10 a week taken from benefits because they do not understand what a punishment that actually is. 

Ignorant.

i guess being down 130 quid a week compared to what you have been used to might be fairly uncomfortable for her,  you can bet she has been living to the limits of those means for the last 5 years, if she has HP on anything she is likely to be defaulting on payments very soon which will bring more court appearances for her in due course. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, 2112 said:

Yes we can condemn and no doubt there will be some socialist liberal wishy washy types defending benefit fraudsters.

How 60's? Will they be long haired, bearded corduroy sandal wearing hippies???

I thought you were left of centre, social housing defendant? Presumably those in live in such?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HeliX said:

But it's spread proportionally to tax paid. If someone steals from the Gov to feed themselves or their family then that's fair game frankly.

Except it’s not.I’ve spent 40 years here paying my taxes and not claimed any benefits. I’m very glad and blessed that I haven’t had to.

I am also glad, that like in most civilised societies, that  my taxes have been used in part to help those others less fortunate than myself. It’s the way it should be.

What I’m not happy about is that people abuse the system and steal, yes not to  beat about the bush, steal money to which they are not entitled.

You say this money was stolen from the Government to feed self and family then this is OK.

If this was a case of having tostaving off hunger then yes. But have you any evidence of this? Or just using emotive language to try and justify your stance?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, HeliX said:

I don't consider the tax that went to benefits "frauds" to be one of my valuable possessions either.

Why have you put “ frauds” in  commas? Benefit fraudsters do actually exist you know.

Presumably you’re happy to send money to the Nigerian 419 “fraudsters”then?

Edited by The Voice of Reason
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Billy Bleach said:

Yet you're happy to support hundreds and hundreds of public sector grifters literally stealing a living off the tax payer and yet don’t get on your high horse about it. Most of this “fraud” is circumstantial and down to oversight or change of circumstances not fraudulent intent. Whereas someone turning up for work on Monday knowing they literally have fuck all to do for the next 6 months or more in their non-job is perfectly fine. I know which one of those is a crook and which one isn’t. 

I  think you are confusing two totally unrelated issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Voice of Reason said:

I  think you are confusing two totally unrelated issues.

I think you are clueless if you see any real harm in what this woman has done.

Those who have access to all the info have chosen to punish her in a way you think is very lenient.

Doesn”t that tell you anything?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Fred the shred said:

The black economy has always been alive and well on the Island with regard to dodging tax but claiming benefits you are not entitled to is on another level completely.    

No.  It's exactly the same thing.  It's depriving the Government of money to which it is entitled.  If you're demanding harsh punishment for benefit fraudsters, then you should demand the same for tax dodgers.  Arguably worse as the latter will usually be better off than the former and so have less excuse.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, John Wright said:

Let’s face it, IoM has had a zero tolerance broken windows policy on drugs for 50+ years. Has it worked. Have we won the “war on drugs”?

We're not doing so badly. That zero policy has served us ok, certainly in comparison to UK.

Keep the drugs and the druggies bastards out of our Island, I say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Voice of Reason said:

Why have you put “ frauds” in  commas? Benefit fraudsters do actually exist you know.

Presumably you’re happy to send money to the Nigerian 419 “fraudsters”then?

Because I don't think forgetting to notify the govt of a change in circumstances should be given the same terminology as wilfully defrauding people.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, HeliX said:

Because I don't think forgetting to notify the govt of a change in circumstances should be given the same terminology as wilfully defrauding people.

"Forgetting". Oh come on.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...