Jump to content

Tesco buy all nine Shoprite supermarkets- Monopoly?


darenisepic

Recommended Posts

As others have said these changes have been going on for generations.

Hansard reports.   vol.      485

Debated Wednesday 14th March. 1951

     "SAUSAGE     (MEAT CONTENT)

Sausages (Meat Content)

Volume 485: debated on Wednesday 14 March 1951

 

Sausages (Meat Content)

Volume 485: debated on Wednesday 14 March  text

(Meat Content)

Volume 485: debated on Wednesday 14 March 1951

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, The Phantom said:

Shrinkflation has been going on forever.  I'm sure the chocolate bars of my youth are about half the size now.  Have you seen a modern wagon wheel?  It's a skateboard wheel.

The cost of living crisis has accelerated it recently though.  But no one wants smaller sausages. 

Definitely. The large Dairy Milk bar was 8oz (227g). When it went metric, it reduced to 200g. A good few years ago it dropped to 150g. Now it’s 100g. Price remains roughly static, though, 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Roger Mexico said:

Oddly enough that can't be used in "pork sausages" nor can offal.  But it can be used in "sausages" according to the article I linked to.  Pork sausages appear to be different from sausages made from pork (and other stuff).

Not researched it, but I seem to remember there was a bit of a to-do many years ago when the percentage of meat in sausages was under the spotlight.  At the time all sorts were being chucked in and there was some ruling (possibly EU) that specified that for something to be described as a pork or beef sausage, here had to be a minimum percentage of the meat in the sausage. Don't know what that percentage may be, but if that minimum isn't met, you could only sell them as sausages with pork or with beef, or something like that.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, emesde said:

As others have said these changes have been going on for generations.

Hansard reports.   vol.      485

Debated Wednesday 14th March. 1951

     "SAUSAGE     (MEAT CONTENT)

Sausages (Meat Content)

Volume 485: debated on Wednesday 14 March 1951

 

Sausages (Meat Content)

Volume 485: debated on Wednesday 14 March  text

(Meat Content)

Volume 485: debated on Wednesday 14 March 1951

I am certain it’s been going on for a long time but that does not make it right . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gladys said:

Not researched it, but I seem to remember there was a bit of a to-do many years ago when the percentage of meat in sausages was under the spotlight.  At the time all sorts were being chucked in and there was some ruling (possibly EU) that specified that for something to be described as a pork or beef sausage, here had to be a minimum percentage of the meat in the sausage. Don't know what that percentage may be, but if that minimum isn't met, you could only sell them as sausages with pork or with beef, or something like that.  

 

How do they define 'meat'?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gladys said:

As I say, haven't researched it, but would imagine it would be muscle attached to bone? 

Includes offal, brain, all sorts

FOOD AND DRUGS
COMPOSITION AND LABELLING
The Sausage and Other Meat Product Regulations 1967

 

IMG_5622.jpeg

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, John Wright said:

Includes offal, brain, all sorts

FOOD AND DRUGS
COMPOSITION AND LABELLING
The Sausage and Other Meat Product Regulations 1967

 

IMG_5622.jpeg

That's what I suspected. So anything from a pig is contributing to the %meat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, emesde said:

Generally pork sausage must contain a minimum of 42 percent meat, but the minimum is 32 percent meat, if the package is labelled as generic sausage.

Oh you can't beat a generic sausage,they're famous for their sausages those generics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Roger Mexico said:

Of course not.  It will have been "NEW IMPROVED RECIPE".

I've always wondered how something can be 'NEW' and 'IMPROVED' at the same time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, kevster said:

I've always wondered how something can be 'NEW' and 'IMPROVED' at the same time

The rub there is that the manufacturers don't actually say who it's improved for, and it's always them, via cheaper shittier ingredients.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All these 'new and improved' things are rubbish really, it just means smaller and shitter. Everything actually gets worse.

Apart from cans of Draught Guinness. That's a product that has continued to improve.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...