Non-Believer Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 3 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Peters Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 Snark all you like, but those first 12 months on the back bench convinced me that getting stuck in was preferable to being a shouty gobshite for the amusement of people who enjoy the faked combat in reality TV shows. I take the job seriously whereas you seem to prefer pointless vote-winning bluster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
display name Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 9 hours ago, Stu Peters said: Snark all you like, but those first 12 months on the back bench convinced me that getting stuck in was preferable to being a shouty gobshite for the amusement of people who enjoy the faked combat in reality TV shows. I take the job seriously whereas you seem to prefer pointless vote-winning bluster. So if you hadn't been convinced over those 12 months,you'd have carried on being a shouty gobshite? As for any pointless vote winning bluster,I believe there's video footage of such activity. Not so sure people prefer pointless vote winning bluster,they just have an aversion to people who don't put their money where their mouth is,but as is often the case,it's difficult to speak with a mouth full Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Peters Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 3 hours ago, display name said: So if you hadn't been convinced over those 12 months,you'd have carried on being a shouty gobshite? As for any pointless vote winning bluster,I believe there's video footage of such activity. Not so sure people prefer pointless vote winning bluster,they just have an aversion to people who don't put their money where their mouth is,but as is often the case,it's difficult to speak with a mouth full I’ll put you down as a ‘maybe’ then… 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
display name Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 (edited) 'maybe' some of those sentences were accurate Edited February 2 by display name Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moghrey Mie Posted February 3 Author Share Posted February 3 Everything's fine apparently. https://www.manxradio.com/news/isle-of-man-news/govt-making-good-progress-with-our-island-plan-says-chief-minister/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forestboy Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 14 minutes ago, Moghrey Mie said: Everything's fine apparently. https://www.manxradio.com/news/isle-of-man-news/govt-making-good-progress-with-our-island-plan-says-chief-minister/ He’s totally deluded. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Tatlock Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 40 minutes ago, Moghrey Mie said: Everything's fine apparently. https://www.manxradio.com/news/isle-of-man-news/govt-making-good-progress-with-our-island-plan-says-chief-minister/ The biggest non-CM we've ever had. It's like everything is on hold. Whilst the reserves get burned... . 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirty Buggane Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 I think were a few fella's short on the shovels. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Non-Believer Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 (edited) Alf the Ringmaster... Edited February 3 by Non-Believer Typo & screenshots 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cissolt Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 58 minutes ago, forestboy said: He’s totally deluded. 1000 houses built by the private sector, is he claiming the ones that had planning permission before he became CM? 9 public sector houses built in 10 years, that's the real barometer things should be measured by. https://www.manxradio.com/news/isle-of-man-news/government-not-meeting-its-housing-targets-says-committee-chair/ One day, someone clever will point out that people spending 70% of the salary on rent and bills every month is money that could be spent locally by the tenants. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moghrey Mie Posted February 4 Author Share Posted February 4 (edited) 1,000 homes 'built' by the private sector between September 2021 and September 2026? What exactly does that mean? The people mentioned in the Poverty Report probably need social housing. Edited February 4 by Moghrey Mie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
english zloty Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 (edited) 6 hours ago, Moghrey Mie said: 1,000 homes 'built' by the private sector between September 2021 and September 2026? What exactly does that mean? The people mentioned in the Poverty Report probably need social housing. It's quite complex. It's a new branch of mathematics whereby the number of real and imaginary houses is directly proportional to the alfgrand value. The alfgrand value is derived from the amount of taxpayers money given to developers as a function of their likelihood them doing anything. Edited February 4 by english zloty 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Non-Believer Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 11 minutes ago, english zloty said: It's quite complex. It's a new branch of mathematics whereby the number of real and imaginary houses is directly proportional to the alfgrand value. The alfgrand value is derived from the amount of taxpayers money given to developers as a function of their likelihood them doing anything. Is the alfgrand value itself a derivative of the multiplier effect, created by Eddie Teare? Who also redefined the meaning of a "balanced budget" and taxpayers as the source of public money? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moghrey Mie Posted February 4 Author Share Posted February 4 1 hour ago, english zloty said: It's quite complex. It's a new branch of mathematics whereby the number of real and imaginary houses is directly proportional to the alfgrand value. The alfgrand value is derived from the amount of taxpayers money given to developers as a function of their likelihood them doing anything. Homes but not houses. That includes apartments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.