Jump to content

The Wright Report


Holte End

Recommended Posts

On 2/3/2024 at 4:23 PM, Roger Mexico said:

Well it's interesting that pointing out that something you wrote was the exact opposite of true is regarded as "nitpicking".  It illustrates the mindset I was describing rather well: no criticism, no matter how well-evidenced is acceptable.  But not as well as the horror at the thought of actually having to apologise to someone so appallingly treated.

Bollocks, it's nit picking as it doesn't relate to my core argument that the review is unable to examine the key area of what efforts were made to settle & reduce exposure to the taxpayer (financially and with regards to reputational), which you've not responded to and instead gone virtue signalling. 

 

This is the difference between the affair costing £600k and £6m (not even accounting for the hammering in national press & strong reaction from the BMA that has likely exacerbated recruitment issues).

 

It's a minor detail as RR is entitled to represent her best case to the tribunal, whether she stays on Island or seeks future employment opportunities (despite being paid out for her career) is all superficial post award. 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...