Jump to content

State of the Roads


Passing Time

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Non-Believer said:

Far too much of our tax also goes to fund social security benefits, social housing, addiction therapy and methadone for young wasters too.

Says the old white well off man living in his ivory towers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Banker said:

Says the old white well off man living in his ivory towers!

The ones in ivory towers are those who ignore the tagline of "fines and costs to be deducted from benefits" that follows conviction after conviction like night follows day...

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Banker said:

Says the old white well off man living in his ivory towers!

How do you know I'm white?

My "ivory tower" (which it is far from) was funded by making choices and cuts in other areas of my life in order to afford it and not expecting the taxpayer to carry on funding them. I believe it's called "prioritising" and "responsibility".

  • Like 6
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Non-Believer said:

Far too much of our tax also goes to fund social security benefits, social housing, addiction therapy and methadone for young wasters too.

 

6 hours ago, P.K. said:

The ones in ivory towers are those who ignore the tagline of "fines and costs to be deducted from benefits" that follows conviction after conviction like night follows day...

It’s easy to point the finger at those on benefits. But perhaps you should look at the £46million tax payers have to pay every year to cover the shortfall in civil service pensions because for years the contributions were set at unsustainably low levels. That’s on top of the £100m we pay as tax payers for current years employer/employee contributions.

You seem to be implying that they are too many unemployed, unemployable, non contributing members of society. Unemployment is at record low levels. You seem to think that because someone claims a benefit they’re a drain. The truth is many benefits enable and empower people to work, and to pay NI and tax.

Payments out of NI - not income tax

£250m State Pensions ( including various supplements and two different schemes- all funded via NI )

£14m incapacity benefit - to those who are in work but cannot currently work due to disabling illness

£1m bereavement support - short term to widows/ers with children

£4.6m maternity allowance - pregnant women

£5m carers allowance - to people who stay at home caring for elderly family or disabled children or young adults. Save millions in state care costs.

£1.2m industrial disablement - for those suffering serious injury at work

£300k income based jobseekers - for those currently looking for work who have an up to date NI record

£1m Christmas bonus

Payments from general tax revenue

£17m Disability Living Allowance, including mobility. More than half goes to people who work. Enabling them to have adaptations in the home, or transport so they can continue working.

£7m Attendance Allowance - to chronically sick or disabled or elderly to enable them to pay for some care. Saves a much greater sum the state would otherwise have to pay to care for them.

£13m child benefit

£39m Income Support ( including rent support/pension top ups ) -  often paid to people to top up low income to an acceptable income.

£9m EPA - subsidising employers who pay low wages. Wages should be high enough that this isn’t required. It’s not the job of the state to subsidise employers.

£1.5m income based Job Seekers Allowance

£1m TV licences for over 75’s

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, John Wright said:

 

It’s easy to point the finger at those on benefits. But perhaps you should look at the £46million tax payers have to pay every year to cover the shortfall in civil service pensions because for years the contributions were set at unsustainably low levels. That’s on top of the £100m we pay as tax payers for current years employer/employee contributions.

You seem to be implying that they are too many unemployed, unemployable, non contributing members of society. Unemployment is at record low levels. You seem to think that because someone claims a benefit they’re a drain. The truth is many benefits enable and empower people to work, and to pay NI and tax.

Payments out of NI - not income tax

£250m State Pensions ( including various supplements and two different schemes- all funded via NI )

£14m incapacity benefit - to those who are in work but cannot currently work due to disabling illness

£1m bereavement support - short term to widows/ers with children

£4.6m maternity allowance - pregnant women

£5m carers allowance - to people who stay at home caring for elderly family or disabled children or young adults. Save millions in state care costs.

£1.2m industrial disablement - for those suffering serious injury at work

£300k income based jobseekers - for those currently looking for work who have an up to date NI record

£1m Christmas bonus

Payments from general tax revenue

£17m Disability Living Allowance, including mobility. More than half goes to people who work. Enabling them to have adaptations in the home, or transport so they can continue working.

£7m Attendance Allowance - to chronically sick or disabled or elderly to enable them to pay for some care. Saves a much greater sum the state would otherwise have to pay to care for them.

£13m child benefit

£39m Income Support ( including rent support/pension top ups ) -  often paid to people to top up low income to an acceptable income.

£9m EPA - subsidising employers who pay low wages. Wages should be high enough that this isn’t required. It’s not the job of the state to subsidise employers.

£1.5m income based Job Seekers Allowance

£1m TV licences for over 75’s

My original reply was in a similarly veined response to the prejudice and bigotry posted by @HiVibes.

But my original point still stands, there cannot be another taxpaying "group" (the motorists) who are relieved of so much tax whilst having such a small percentage of it reinvested in their public infrastructure.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Non-Believer said:

But my original point still stands, there cannot be another taxpaying "group" (the motorists) who are relieved of so much tax whilst having such a small percentage of it reinvested in their public infrastructure.

Smokers certainly get relieved of a lot of tax and what they get back in health care they lose in dying early.   Drinkers probably similar, moderate drinkers maybe most of all.  Most tax is taken because people are able to pay it, not because those paying expect to get it back straight away.  All tax is redistributive - if only over time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/16/2024 at 9:30 PM, Stu Peters said:

Fact is, DOI looks at repairs and maintenance and prioritises jobs based on danger, traffic flow, type and estimated cost of repair etc. Like all deparments we're under the cosh financially and can't do everything all at once.

But aren’t you actually responsible for the state of the roads? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...