Fred the shred Posted September 7 Share Posted September 7 The Commissioners have rejected signage on Onchan Football Club clubhouse. Why we do not know unless it is a spiteful action because they have fallen out with a member who is and has been a stalwart of the club for many years. This is beyond pathetic even for the said commissioners this small minded decision sets a new low. 2 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarndyce Posted September 7 Share Posted September 7 1 hour ago, Fred the shred said: Why we do not know unless it is a spiteful action because they have fallen out with a member who is and has been a stalwart of the club for many years. This is beyond pathetic even for the said commissioners this small minded decision sets a new low Onchan Commissioners, innit? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Lamb Posted September 7 Share Posted September 7 Do we know this to be true? It was alleged, but then denied by the old twat who runs the FB group on politics. Who to believe, eh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banker Posted September 7 Share Posted September 7 Well Quirky is closely tied to Onchan football club and on Onchan commissioners so maybe they’re objecting to him 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred the shred Posted September 7 Author Share Posted September 7 It will be in the minutes but they are usually well behind….. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Passing Time Posted September 7 Share Posted September 7 Onchan commissioners should be disbanded. They don’t serve Onchan residents at all. Too much infighting and bullying going on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Non-Believer Posted September 7 Share Posted September 7 Maybe they're looking to pay off another Clerk or something.. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ham_N_Eggs Posted September 7 Share Posted September 7 3 hours ago, Fred the shred said: It will be in the minutes but they are usually well behind….. They approved the signage in July (it's in the minutes). This is fake news. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Mexico Posted September 8 Share Posted September 8 2 hours ago, Ham_N_Eggs said: They approved the signage in July (it's in the minutes). This is fake news. Indeed it is: 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred the shred Posted September 8 Author Share Posted September 8 It is in Onchan District News. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Hedgehog Posted September 8 Share Posted September 8 I'm still chuckling at Quirkio claiming that the landfill by the airport used to be half a mile deep on the Gammon Line the other day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thommo2010 Posted September 8 Share Posted September 8 Does anyone else feel its mental that the commissioners have to say yes it's OK to stick up a sogn on a building that's already been approved? I mean it's a small sign why can't they just stick it up? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Mexico Posted September 8 Share Posted September 8 26 minutes ago, Fred the shred said: It is in Onchan District News. Unless it's a new one, it's been approved: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred the shred Posted September 8 Author Share Posted September 8 Well it is kicking off on Onchan District News there may have been a development . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Mexico Posted September 8 Share Posted September 8 1 hour ago, thommo2010 said: Does anyone else feel its mental that the commissioners have to say yes it's OK to stick up a [sign] on a building that's already been approved? I mean it's a small sign why can't they just stick it up? Because one person's 'small sign' may be a lot of other people's hideous visual intrusion. So there are rules, though small signs under a certain specified size probably are exempt. And there are different, stricter rules for illuminated signs, which will affect neighbours more. But because most signs are uncontroversial, the power is normally devolved to local authorities, rather than Planning Committee and most get approved pretty quickly - this one only took six weeks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.