Tinpot Posted Monday at 08:50 PM Author Share Posted Monday at 08:50 PM 1 minute ago, Gladys said: Why do you think the rules aren't being adhered to? I just asked the question who was paying it, as the article mentioned other costs that had been covered and then said everything was going to charity. Curious, that’s all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred the shred Posted Monday at 08:52 PM Share Posted Monday at 08:52 PM St Peter’s in Onchan have been doing this for ages with a Prosecco and fish and chips in the church so it isn’t anything new. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted Monday at 08:53 PM Share Posted Monday at 08:53 PM 2 minutes ago, Tinpot said: I just asked the question who was paying it, as the article mentioned other costs that had been covered and then said everything was going to charity. Curious, that’s all. But your mates at ELS have voiced concerns? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred the shred Posted Monday at 08:55 PM Share Posted Monday at 08:55 PM St Peter’s charge a reasonable amount and it makes a fair bit for Church funds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinpot Posted Monday at 08:56 PM Author Share Posted Monday at 08:56 PM 3 minutes ago, Gladys said: But your mates at ELS have voiced concerns? I don’t have mates at ELS. I was using them as an example of people who are known to do things properly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted Monday at 08:59 PM Share Posted Monday at 08:59 PM 24 minutes ago, Tinpot said: At the end of the day, rules are rules and everyone should be on a level playing field. Have a word on the guys at ELS and see what their thoughts on the matter are. There are loads of events they could put on and hope nobody would care but they don’t, they do it properly or they don’t do it at all and it costs money. Why should other places or people just be allowed to ignore rules in the name of a few people having fun? Hopefully it’s all in hand and above board. An implication of having the inside track? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinpot Posted Monday at 09:01 PM Author Share Posted Monday at 09:01 PM 2 minutes ago, Gladys said: An implication of having the inside track? Not at all. You are over thinking and over analysing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted Monday at 09:05 PM Share Posted Monday at 09:05 PM 2 minutes ago, Tinpot said: Not at all. You are over thinking and over analysing. Sometimes, that is what you need to do to screen out bollocks. So, you original post was just to stir the pot? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinpot Posted Monday at 09:14 PM Author Share Posted Monday at 09:14 PM (edited) 9 minutes ago, Gladys said: Sometimes, that is what you need to do to screen out bollocks. So, you original post was just to stir the pot? No. It was very clearly asking a question that wasn’t covered in the article or anywhere on their Facebook page. Edited Monday at 09:15 PM by Tinpot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A fool and his money..... Posted Monday at 09:16 PM Share Posted Monday at 09:16 PM 19 minutes ago, Tinpot said: I don’t have mates at ELS. I was using them as an example of people who are known to do things properly. How do you know they do it properly then? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted Monday at 09:17 PM Share Posted Monday at 09:17 PM 2 minutes ago, Tinpot said: No. It was very clearly asking a question that wasn’t covered in the article or anywhere on their Facebook page. Why would the article or FB page say "we are doing this legally"? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alanbellend Posted Monday at 09:21 PM Share Posted Monday at 09:21 PM 1 hour ago, thommo2010 said: It pretty much shows all the nonsense. Trying to show a film and all the hassle you need to go through. Why bother? She should do what Euromanx did as in flight entertainment by running black and white Laurel & Hardy and Harold Lloyd films that were 30 years out of copyright as in flight entertainment. Now there was a low budget airline. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted Monday at 09:22 PM Share Posted Monday at 09:22 PM 4 minutes ago, A fool and his money..... said: How do you know they do it properly then? How does Tinpot know ELS's views on the matter? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinpot Posted Monday at 09:24 PM Author Share Posted Monday at 09:24 PM Just now, Gladys said: How does Tinpot know ELS's views on the matter? Blimey. No wonder nobody bothers to post on here 🙄 I know they are a respected enough businesses that I would be sure they do things properly and above board. That’s all. I haven’t spoken to them, I don’t know their views on this particular venture, I don’t even know them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted Monday at 09:25 PM Share Posted Monday at 09:25 PM 1 minute ago, Tinpot said: Blimey. No wonder nobody bothers to post on here 🙄 I know they are a respected enough businesses that I would be sure they do things properly and above board. That’s all. I haven’t spoken to them, I don’t know their views on this particular venture, I don’t even know them. So why make the comment? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.