manxchatterbox Posted November 4, 2005 Share Posted November 4, 2005 In the planning applications in the press this week - 05/02044A - "Approval in principal for the demolition of existing tractor shed and construction of a residential housing development consisting of four apartments and seventeen houses with associated entrance and drainage works, Tractor Shed and Land forming part of golf course, Derbyhaven Road, Derbyhaven" sorry how many houses??? SEVENTEEN !!!!! who owns the golf course???? what do the members say???? why hasn't the story received more prominence in the press or on the radio??? why hasn't a local journalist done a follow up story? - does no one care??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dontlookbehindyou Posted November 4, 2005 Share Posted November 4, 2005 Puts hand up..... I'll have one when there ready. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cabbyl ushtey Posted November 4, 2005 Share Posted November 4, 2005 That'll be Ferguson Lacey I suppose. He has had a busy week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempus Fugit Posted November 4, 2005 Share Posted November 4, 2005 a good day to bury an application whilst everyone is worying about a cinema and bowling alley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy One Mate Posted November 4, 2005 Share Posted November 4, 2005 Do you have something against Mr Ferguson - Lacy Mr Chatterbox, i got that idea from your postings on the Cinema thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Flynn Posted November 4, 2005 Share Posted November 4, 2005 In the planning applications in the press this week - 05/02044A - "Approval in principal for the demolition of existing tractor shed and construction of a residential housing development consisting of four apartments and seventeen houses with associated entrance and drainage works, Tractor Shed and Land forming part of golf course, Derbyhaven Road, Derbyhaven" sorry how many houses??? SEVENTEEN !!!!! who owns the golf course???? what do the members say???? why hasn't the story received more prominence in the press or on the radio??? why hasn't a local journalist done a follow up story? - does no one care??? Someone does care and has been caring since 1938 about Manx planning. The Society for the Preservation of the Manx Countryside & Environment, of which I am Chairman, submits observations to DOLGE on about 20 applications each week. My planning sub-committee says on this one: "This would mean that Derbyhaven becomes a satellite village to Castletown. It is not usually considered good planning to create a new or enlarged settlement which relies on just one road access or is situated immediately adjacent to an airport. The idea was certainly not promulgated when considering the local plan. Thus on both zoning and common sense grounds we feel it necessary to OPPOSE this application. It also represents development along the coastline, similarly contrary to Policy." We have raised no objection the the Douglas development of cinema etc on planning grounds. If anyone has any observation to make they should write to the Secretary of the Planning Committee, DOLGE, Mount Havelock, Douglas. All applications now will be discussed in public. There is no longer a Review stage but there is an Appeal if necessary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheesemonster2005 Posted November 5, 2005 Share Posted November 5, 2005 In the planning applications in the press this week - 05/02044A - "Approval in principal for the demolition of existing tractor shed and construction of a residential housing development consisting of four apartments and seventeen houses with associated entrance and drainage works, Tractor Shed and Land forming part of golf course, Derbyhaven Road, Derbyhaven" sorry how many houses??? SEVENTEEN !!!!! who owns the golf course???? what do the members say???? why hasn't the story received more prominence in the press or on the radio??? why hasn't a local journalist done a follow up story? - does no one care??? Seventeen isn't exactly a large number. Is it your golf course? |What's the problem? I'd rather they built on expensive golf courses rather than building on open fields and woodland. Who gives a shit about what the members think? How much for a house? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celt Posted November 5, 2005 Share Posted November 5, 2005 I'm getting to like you Mr Flynn. It so welcoming to see a person with political knowledge have the courage to come on an open forum. Maybe the ones in power aren't bothered or haven't got the bottle but anyway, I take my hat off to you for taking the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxchatterbox Posted November 6, 2005 Author Share Posted November 6, 2005 Would you trust any of the defendants in this case?? IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE PETER KALTMAN DEFINED 1 CONTRIEXJTION PLAN, 1 1 Plaintiff, 1 1 V. 1 Civil Action No. 93-50-RRM 1 GULF USA CORP., GRAHAM FERGUSON 1 LACEY, KEITH D. HOLJESON and DAVID 1 J. ANGELICCHIO, 1 > Defendants. 1 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT In this securities fraud case, the defendants have moved for summary judgment. The Court has read the papers, and heard oral argument on November 10, 1993. Summary judgment is appropriate when the evidence offered demonstrates that there is no genuine issue of material fact in dispute and no jury could reasonably find that the nonmoving party is entitled to judgment in its favor. Anderson v. Libertv Lobbv. Inc., U.S. 242 (1986). The plaintiff alleges that Gulfs November 13, 1992 press release and third quarter 10-Q were materially misleading because of defendants' knowing omissions of material facts. The defendants raise three arguments as to why they should be granted summary judgment. They argue that the plaintiff cannot show reliance, there is no scienter, and there were no material omissions from the public statements. The Court rejects the defendants' arguments. In a case such as this, which seeks to predicate rule lob-5 liability upon omissions, SNIPPETS: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION In this securities fraud case, the defendants have moved for summary judgment. Court has read the papers, and heard oral argument on November 10, 1993. Summary judgment is appropriate when the evidence offered demonstrates that there is no genuine issue of material fact in dispute and no jury could reasonably find that the They argue that the plaintiff cannot show reliance, there is no scienter, and there were no material omissions from the public statements. In a case such as this, which seeks to predicate rule lob-5 liability upon omissions, 903 F.2d 186, 202 (3rd Cir. defendants were reckless in their treatment of material information. the Court does not fully adopt the plaintiffs theory that Gulfs November public statements were materially misleading. material inside information to Eric Ryback, an active trader of Gulf securities, without obtaining a confidentiality agreement or disclosing this information to the public. "The duty imposed on a company and its officers is an alternative one: inside information either to no outsiders or to all outsiders equally." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempus Fugit Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 just wondering whether anything has happened about the airport hotel project approved in 2004 ? http://www.isleofmancourier.co.uk/ViewArti...rticleID=843189 Mr Lacey seems to have a fascination with other bits of land which stick out into the sea ! http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/s...000/2538261.stm http://www.hotelreviewscotland.com/hotel.asp?ID=207 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxchatterbox Posted November 7, 2005 Author Share Posted November 7, 2005 or indeeed what has happened to the plans for use of the old post office headquaters on Circular Road ?? (another GFL property) I wonder if any of the schemes need any element of Government/taxpayers funding??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spanna Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 hmm does this mean the planning application to convert the farm ruins (on madocs hill,Langness) to a greenskeeper house and workshop etc has been approved? Can that be stopped because a protected species lives in the ruins? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxchatterbox Posted November 7, 2005 Author Share Posted November 7, 2005 take a look at web-site Oliver's Guide to Cornwall/miscellanea about Land's End / Graham Ferguson Lacey :- quote:- "It is difficult to find words to express the shame for what has been done to Land's End. Both Jane and I remember it from our childhood as a place of magic with an end-of-the-world feeling, the only human intervention a small hotel and a tearoom. Then in 1981 Welsh entrepreneur David Goldstone outbid the National Trust for the estate. He sold on to the mysterious Peter de Savary (Skibo Castle, Bovey Castle and Caribbean resorts) in 1987. De Savary bought John o'Groats in 1989 but then got into financial trouble and sold both in 1991 to Isle of Man entrepreneur Graham Ferguson Lacey. Now the hotel has been greatly extended and vulgarised and a small and tatty theme park introduced to separate the visitor from his money. Much of the clifftop is roped off and inaccessible. And even the famed direction sign (New York 3147 miles) is subject to a fee if you want to be pictured by it. What a sad place it is now! Is this what we want for Langness and the Castletown golf course and Derbyhaven beach???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karellen Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 take a look at web-site Oliver's Guide to Cornwall/miscellanea about Land's End / Graham Ferguson Lacey :- quote:- "It is difficult to find words to express the shame for what has been done to Land's End. Both Jane and I remember it from our childhood as a place of magic with an end-of-the-world feeling, the only human intervention a small hotel and a tearoom. Then in 1981 Welsh entrepreneur David Goldstone outbid the National Trust for the estate. He sold on to the mysterious Peter de Savary (Skibo Castle, Bovey Castle and Caribbean resorts) in 1987. De Savary bought John o'Groats in 1989 but then got into financial trouble and sold both in 1991 to Isle of Man entrepreneur Graham Ferguson Lacey. Now the hotel has been greatly extended and vulgarised and a small and tatty theme park introduced to separate the visitor from his money. Much of the clifftop is roped off and inaccessible. And even the famed direction sign (New York 3147 miles) is subject to a fee if you want to be pictured by it. What a sad place it is now! A businessman maximising the income from his investments. Whoever would have thought of such a thing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P.K. Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 He didn't buy the view. The point is that if there are insufficient or weak controls then this type of tacky development spreads and just spoils everything. By all means go ahead and waste your money on a load of old tat but don't expect others not to criticise your support for monuments to bad taste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.