crumlin Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 At this mornings high court the Advocates for the Neds have asked for a further delay untill next year the courts have agreed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slim Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 Unreal. Imagine what the advocates fees are by now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Fox Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 Hmm this ain't no suprise.. Thats another fine mess you got me into Stanley!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonan3 Posted November 18, 2005 Share Posted November 18, 2005 Manx Radio today: (Before Crumlin starts another thread on the subject) The wife of former Chief Minister Richard Corkill is facing two further charges in relation to building work carried out at their home at Ballacain, Onchan in 2002 and 2003. At the same time one of the partners in a building firm involved in the work has also been charged. Earlier today Julie Corkill was accused of false accounting and issuing a false document. Through her advocates she has told Manx Radio she is "not guilty" of the offences. Mrs Corkill had previously been charged with obtaining a money transfer by deception and false accounting. The builder, William Kelly, faces one count of forgery. Mrs Corkill is due to stand trial on December 5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crumlin Posted November 18, 2005 Author Share Posted November 18, 2005 And Mrs Corkill is in court to face two charges on 29th November 2005, He must be next Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian rush Posted November 18, 2005 Share Posted November 18, 2005 At this mornings high court the Advocates for the Neds have asked for a further delay untill next year the courts have agreed And what did FCMRs brief have to say about it all did he agree as well [punctuation deliberately left out] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chufty Posted November 18, 2005 Share Posted November 18, 2005 CHARGES 2 + 2 = 4 + ? = ? , MULTIPLE SERIOUS CHARGES BEING HEARD IN A SUMMARY COURT, NEVER HEARD OF BEFORE, IT MUST NOW GO TO A COURT OF GENERAL GOAL SO EXPECT FURTHER DELAYS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mission Posted November 18, 2005 Share Posted November 18, 2005 Did you get bored with your other account? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarahc Posted November 18, 2005 Share Posted November 18, 2005 2 + 2 = 4 + 0 = 4. Did I get it right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crumlin Posted November 19, 2005 Author Share Posted November 19, 2005 2 + 2 = 4 + 0 = 4. Did I get it right? No. Should Ned now resign as an MHK, I cant believe that hes had nothing to do with all whats going on, or is he just a spineless bastard whos letting his wife take the rap just so he can save he Government pension Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Declan Posted November 19, 2005 Share Posted November 19, 2005 So you've not only tried and convicted her, but also him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crumlin Posted November 19, 2005 Author Share Posted November 19, 2005 So you've not only tried and convicted her, but also him. No smoke without Fire, remember his speach We have done nothing wrong and also the speach by the Milkman, It will come back to bite them on the Ass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Declan Posted November 19, 2005 Share Posted November 19, 2005 Who's the milkman? Let the courts do their job. The time to kick up a fuss is after decsion if there's a white wash. Not at this delicate stage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crumlin Posted November 19, 2005 Author Share Posted November 19, 2005 Who's the milkman? Its one of the ex CMs who the boys are trying to fix up with a job at the moment, Mr Stalker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Declan Posted November 19, 2005 Share Posted November 19, 2005 Oh I thought you meant him. No I don't recall a speech from him on this subject - do you have a link? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.