ans Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 or how far a swallow can fly carrying a coconut in its beak? Is that an African swallow or a European one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScope Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 I..I dont know that...Arghhhhhhhhh!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTool Posted January 12, 2006 Author Share Posted January 12, 2006 Well i didnt know that to answer a question you can just get away with insulting someone and there point of view, i will have to try that myself see if it works. Belive what you will but there is a growning opinion around the globe that questions need addressing. How can you have an investigation when you ship all the evidence away to china ? I always thought a crime scene was left for the forensic people to gain evidence or am i just being naive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ans Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 or am i just being naive. That's just one of the words I could use.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTool Posted January 12, 2006 Author Share Posted January 12, 2006 You did it again haha your quite good at that, can you give me any tips on how to get away with insulting people as i have not got the interlect to do it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VinnieK Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 All this banging on about the physics of the WTC fall indicating some sinister conspiracy, and yet, to my knowledge, there wasn't and isn't a huge outcry on the part of major figures in physc and engineering around the world pointing this out (a hand full of obscure self proclaimed 'experts' on conspiracy websites counts as neither an outcry or involving major figures in those fields). Note: Talk of bowling balls falling at the same rate as the Trade centre is nonsense - things only fall at the same rate in a vaccuum, the air resistence on a bowling ball would be negligeable compared with that on just one floor of the world trade centre. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Old Git Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 Vinnie, this is part of the problem that I have with the conspiracy theories. Whatever little point that just might be worth looking further into is drowned out by nonsense such as not knowing how many black boxes there should be, the use of very selective photos to try to prove that a passenger jet didn't crash into the Penagon, the nonsense about the laws of physics being defied and finally the very tenous links with fascism. BTW - the figure I quoted for the bowling ball was complete bollocks - I just wanted to see if anyone ever checked anything that was posted on the internet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ans Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 BTW - the figure I quoted for the bowling ball was complete bollocks - I just wanted to see if anyone ever checked anything that was posted on the internet. Haha! Well played sir. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crozza Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTool Posted January 12, 2006 Author Share Posted January 12, 2006 Iran is next for the chop i reckon, i think easter time will be when they go in there. When is it going to stop this so called war on terror it seems to go on and on with no real end. I think this is going to be another vietnam and they are going to drop mini nuclear bombs in iran so i read Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ans Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 I think this is going to be another vietnam It's comments like that which completely invalidate your opinion in my eyes. You're merely repeating what you've read or been told somewhere else and are putting it here in a failed attempt to look insightful. Sadly the comparison with Vietnam is laughably wrong. Please feel free to list similarities and explain to us how the two are related in any way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crozza Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theintelligentthug Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 I think this is going to be another vietnam Sadly the comparison with Vietnam is laughably wrong. Please feel free to list similarities and explain to us how the two are related in any way. its a war which was vastly unpopular, both at the beginning and toward what could be perceived as the end. both turned out to be wars of attrition, with the invading forces victories being hollow, and the "insurgent" side willing to die rather than "surrender". massive opposition to the invasion at home. im probably wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VinnieK Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 I think this is going to be another vietnam Sadly the comparison with Vietnam is laughably wrong. Please feel free to list similarities and explain to us how the two are related in any way. its a war which was vastly unpopular, both at the beginning and toward what could be perceived as the end. both turned out to be wars of attrition, with the invading forces victories being hollow, and the "insurgent" side willing to die rather than "surrender". massive opposition to the invasion at home. im probably wrong. 'probably' is a bit optimistic. The comparison with vietnam is woefully inadequate: a civil war with both sides being supplied, trained and directly assisted militarily by huge industrial an military cold war powers. The Communist forces in the Vietnam war weren't the kind of 'insurgents' we see in Iraq but an organised and professional army. Iraq, by contrast is an almost textbook example of the an old colonial war (in form, not purpose before we all start rending our clothes and screaming 'imperialism'). Also, the war in Iraq was not 'unpopular' in the US at the beginning, and nor was Vietnam, for that matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTool Posted January 12, 2006 Author Share Posted January 12, 2006 Well its just a shame things have to be settled by force, i know Iran are loose cannons with the nuclear issue but how did they get the nuclear stuff in the first place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.