Crozza Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarahc Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 Does anyone get the feeling we're going round in circles? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScope Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 Exactly sarah Thats what gets me about so many threads on here, its not like anyone is ever going to say "oh yeah, actually you're right and I'm wrong". Nobody could stand to lose that much face. All concerned should probably just step away from the thread. Unless they've got nothing better to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slim Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 Can we take our tin foil hats off too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScope Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 No, keep them on. Suits you sir! Now I'm just about to put the kettle on. Would anyone like a cup of tea? With biscuits. Mmm, biscuits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTool Posted February 1, 2006 Author Share Posted February 1, 2006 You decide for yourself Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarahc Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 Don't eat the biscuits! It's a trap set by the CIA to make you fat and then die of heart disease. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitro Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 You decide for yourself Link The guy filming looked like he was expecting it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
haX0red_Account Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 hmm but does anyone get the feeling that the sceptical posters here are being blinkered because they insist on referring to the collapse which as we've seen is contentious and unresolvable; they're quite happy to keep re-asserting these points but have no interest in commenting on the debris pattern, lack of video in washington, passports, the reinsurance contract, insider dealing, cellphones on planes and so on. Why? I think the whole topic suffers from being a 'conspiracy theory' - surely it's just 'contemporary history'? It doesn't mean you're mentally deficient just to acknowledge irregularities and not have to buy-in to every bit of the case! Wilddog encapsulates it all really; what an enquiring mind. Quite unfair as well to call anyone who believes in any of it to be a gullible fool. Probably tonnes of references to this but you can find many references to people who 'heard' about hitler's Final Solution and got a lot of stick and derision for it....but the point is, this is just one 'conspiracy theory' which did actually turn out to be true- unless your name is Irving or ahmadinejad anyway! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitro Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 Having look at that video in full ( http://ufotheatre.com/SecretEvilOf911.wmv ) It shows that WTC 7 did fall perfectly, like a controlled explosion and when you look at WTC 1 & 2 they both fall very similar when the planes actually hit in different places. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
haX0red_Account Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 Having look at that video in full ( http://ufotheatre.com/SecretEvilOf911.wmv ) It shows that WTC 7 did fall perfectly, like a controlled explosion and when you look at WTC 1 & 2 they both fall very similar when the planes actually hit in different places. and although the collapse of the buildings is a major shock the surrounding area, it's no more than a richter scale of 2.1 to 2.4..well within the earthquake tolerances...so how did wtc7 become destabilised? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilDDog Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 I think Rog has explained it all really in post 284. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crozza Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crozza Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTool Posted February 1, 2006 Author Share Posted February 1, 2006 How could they Pull WTC7 so fast, it would need weeks of planning and setting up to be able to drop it that fast. or can a controlled demolistion be done in a few hours ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.